You know what really angered me? That the Republicans voting against her voted “by proxy.” Not only do they fail as leaders in their own Party, they prove they are the slimy, lilly-livered, spineless, d—less, hopeless, sacks of monkey crap they are!
But I will give some tiny ounce of credit to Linsdey Graham.
“I’m deciding to vote for a woman I would not have chosen,” Graham said. Obama’s choice to nominate the first-ever Latina to the highest court is “a big deal,” he added, declaring that, “America has changed for the better with her selection.”
The media’s analysis is this.
Others in the party, however, are concerned that doing so could hurt their efforts to broaden their base, and particularly alienate Hispanic voters, a fast-growing segment of the U.S. electorate.
President Obama received 67% of the Latino vote. Overall, Democrats were getting closer to 70%. With less than a third of Latinos still “tercos” and voting Republican because of their anti-woman and anti-gay views, I don’t know if they will be so angered that they will switch. In other words, can Democrats add to their strong Latino numbers?
Instead of worrying about the 30% that will most likely remain GOPers, Democrats, instead must concentrate on building within the Latino population that leans Democratic, but has become so apathetic and, I would argue, psychologically disenfranchised by Republican attacks and lack of Democratic defense. At times, Latinos can’t figure out where Democrats stand, especially on immigration, 287(g) and enforcement-only policies that continue with President Obama in office.
Democrats must do better than the same old, failed formulas provided by high-paid consultants whose only job is to target “likely voters.”




