Monthly Archives: October 2009

On Tier One…

Since the Tier One talk began, I have seen and heard folks giving their wholesale support to Proposition 4–Funding for Tier One.  I had not heard a proper description of Tier One until I found an article by the President of UT-Dallas.

What Are Tier One Universities?
There is no universally accepted definition for a Tier One university, but three definitions might be considered:
1. Membership in the Association of American Universities (AAU), which is “the club” of the nation’s 60 best research universities. Texas has 3 AAU institutions – Rice, Texas A&M, and UT Austin. California has nine – Caltech, Stanford, UC Berkeley, UC Davis, UC Irvine, UCLA, UC San Diego, UC Santa Barbara, and USC. New York has seven. Perhaps no statistic better reflects Texas’ disadvantage with respect to Tier One universities than this lag behind California and New York. For reference, the AAU universities are listed in Table 1 with those in CA, NY, and TX highlighted.
2. Annual research expenditures of $100 M or more. Research funding is critical to being a Tier One university, and a minimum of $100 million of annual research funding is often mentioned as an essential credential.
3. U.S. News and World Report Rankings. Research funding alone does not make a university top tier. Other factors, such as quality and reputation, are also important. National rankings, such as the often-cited U.S. News and World Report rankings, consider reputation, quality, funding, research productivity, and others. The U.S. News rankings, though subject to criticism, have become widely used and quoted. The top 50 public national universities from the 2008 U.S. News and World Report rankings are shown in Table 2 for reference, with those in the three most populous states (CA, TX, and NY) highlighted.

Perhaps the one we should be paying most attention to is #3 and it’s “Other factors” sentence.  Quality and reputation are indeed important.  Quality can be based on the rigors of the programs, but also by the quality of the stats produced by the institution, such as graduation rates.

Because graduation rates are based on a period of 6-years, let’s check the stats for some of the Tier One schools currently in the mix:  UCLA-89%; UC-Berkeley-86%; UT and A&M-77%, respectively.  Even one of the lower-ranked schools, University of Arizona, came in at 55%.  So, as one can see, these schools have earned a bit of respect because they are able to send out their graduates to the workforce pretty effectively.

Let’s look at graduation rates for some of the schools we are voting on:  U of Houston:  42%; U of North Texas:  45%;  UT-San Antonio-30%; Texas Tech-57%; UT-Arlington-39%; UT-Dallas-56%; UT-El Paso-26%.

DosCentavos.net has mentioned it before.  The priorities of the Texas Legislature are screwed up.  While they want to throw research funding at these universities, the majority of them have not reached that “respected” level of graduation rates that are seen as “Tier One.”  The Legislature has failed to show progress in increasing graduation rates at most of these universities that we are considering on the ballot, yet, we want to support what may be a futile attempt to gain some sort of artificial status?

Until the Legislature (1) Improves funding and programs to ensure our K-12 students are prepared for a University education, (2) Improves funding and programming to reduce the number of college students enrolled in developmental (remedial) courses to prepare them for a University experience, and (3) Improves funding and programming to increase retention and graduation programs, then the dream of becoming Tier One will only be a dream.

DosCentavos.net recommends a NO vote on Proposition 4.  But if you truly must vote for Prop. 4, then make a concerted effort to join the fight to truly improve our colleges and universities, as Prop 4 supporter State Rep. Garnet Coleman (as Kuff posted) stated:

In addition, Rep. Coleman reiterated his call for greater investment and action from the state towards Texas’ higher education system. This includes lowering and freezing tuition rates, increasing scholarships for middle income families, preserving TEXAS Grants and the top ten percent, and properly funding community colleges in Texas.

For the best higher education system, it is imperative that the state recognize and support what is oftentimes the bridge to four year colleges and universities: community colleges. Increasing the role of early college high schools, and empowering these colleges ensures that a higher education is within reach of every Texas student that desires one.

 

Lawsuit Against City Council Prayers

Imposing religion upon taxpayers has finally earned the City of Houston a lawsuit.

Kay Staley, a real estate agent and lawyer, argues religion and prayer are private matters that don’t belong in government. She sued the city and Councilmember Anne Clutterbuck, saying the council’s prayers are so overly Christian they violate the First Amendment separation of church and state. Clutterbuck was singled out for saying the Lord’s Prayer.

As an TV-fan of City Council meetings and as someone who does not practice organized religion (save the occasional church wedding and funeral) I must agree with Kay Staley.

“I’ve been aggravated about it for some time watching City Council on access television,” said Staley, who doesn’t share her personal spiritual beliefs except to say she’s a free thinker. “I’m offended. I don’t like people telling me when and how to pray.”

The City seems to be taking a general defensive posture, but it is Staley’s attorney who takes an interesting approach.

Randall Kallinen, Staley’s lawyer on both the Bible and prayer cases, said they reviewed about 70 city hall meeting prayers and targeted Clutterbuck because she used the Lord’s Prayer straight out of the Gospel.

A public meeting prayer is more likely to be deemed unconstitutional, Kallinen said, if a city employee does the praying instead of an invited outsider, or if a message comes purely from one religion.

As the article states, and I can agree, other members of Council have gone further, including my own district councilman, Mike Sullivan.

Frankly, I support this lawsuit based on the principle of separation of church and state.

I wonder who’ll be invoking a liberal like Jesus when Sullivan, Clutterbuck, and Lawrence attempt to allow the wholesale round-up of Latinos at their “emergency” meeting on Wednesday.

So much for “Christian.”

What’s In a Name?

A story in the Chron about a New Mexico hotel owner forcing his Latino workers to anglicize or change their names should not really surprise us.

Larry Whitten marched into this northern New Mexico town in late July on a mission: resurrect a failing hotel.

The tough-talking former Marine immediately laid down some new rules. Among them, he forbade the Hispanic workers at the run-down, Southwestern adobe-style hotel from speaking Spanish in his presence (he thought they’d be talking about him), and ordered some to Anglicize their names.

According to some experts, we’ve even lost elections because of “ethnic-sounding” names.  Some feel that anglicizing a name, or changing it altogether, gives one an edge, perhaps a bit more of “acceptance” by the dominant culture.  For others, they may be suffering from identity issues, as I have been accused by a “one-time” reader, for my nickname.

And then there’s me.  A guy who simply got tired of having his first name and his original nickname butchered.  A guy who tired of having to spend the first 3 minutes of a conversation correcting people or explaining the origins of my name when there is business to tend to, without giving the appearance of being annoyed or, worse, angry.

But it hasn’t been all about intercultural strife.

Growing up, I had to deal with fellow Chicanos who butchered my last name, too.  Instead of “Meh-Deh-yeen,” they would say “Meh-Dah-een”.  It was quite annoying–even more annoying than the Anglicization of it, like “Muh-delynn” or “Med-lynn”.  (Or as much as I get annoyed when I hear someone call themselves “Garr-cee-uh” or “Marr-tee-nehz”.)

Either we have been forced to conform, annoyed into doing it, or we have some issues with our identity.

Perhaps I have suffered from all three, mostly by choice.  The hotel workers in New Mexico; not so much.

More on this topic soon.

Annise Wins! Locke’s Mail Outfit?

Answering each question as a future mayor should, Annise Parker defeated her opponents in Saturday evening’s debate on KHOU.  Parker has remained consistent in her responses to similar questions throughout this long process.

DosCentavos was particularly impressed with her response to the 287(g) question.  Stating that she would ensure questioning one’s citizenship is kept to actual processing in the jails and asked uniformly of all those booked into the City Jail was perhaps the most tolerable.  Of Locke’s answer, DosCentavos does not know what to think, considering the local Cops’ union is sending out a mailer to Republicans on Locke’s behalf featuring the widow of a slain Houston police officer as a means of inciting anti-Latino voting behavior.  I wish the reporters had asked about this mailer.

What was particularly perturbing is that right before the 287(g) question, the SAP symbol appeared on the corner of my TV.  Coincidence?

The question that I found the funniest is one that has been brought up at various Latino forums regarding their Spanish speaking abilities.  Well, if Locke wins, perhaps he can offer me $640 per hour to serve as the city’s official translator. Otherwise, while it may be too late (and time-consuming) for the candidates to learn Spanish, as long as they make sure they hire folks who can communicate, we should be alright.  And if Roy Morales wants to keep complaining about Latinos being required to speak English, then he can increase funding for English-learning classes at our local libraries. (All of them could do that, instead of spending millions of wasted dollars on 287(g)).

I have heard complaints about a lack of Latino strategy on the part of all of the candidates.  While I am concerned, I prefer consistent messaging with the hopes of the message getting to all communities.  I believe Annise Parker has that message, rather than telling one community one thing for votes, and promising little gifts to another’s elected leaders for votes and club endorsements.

One thing is for sure, Locke is hiring some bad people to do his mail, I have heard rumors that he is promising a key committee seat to one council member (whose district race I skipped today) who recently signed on to Toni Lawrence’s 287(g) whine-fest next week, which basically targets the Latino community.  Whether Lawrence, Clutterbuck and Sullivan have any success next week or not, they will get media attention, hence, the further vilification of the Latino community.  Considering Locke’s ties to one of these folks in said rumor, Locke’s Latinos should be asking questions, or is this something that is considered “politically tolerable”?

Continued Republican Political Posturing

Well, it looks like Toni Lawrence, Mike Sullivan, and Anne Clutterbuck are playing the usual Republican politics of the day. Lawrence, backed by the other two, has called for an “emergency” city council meeting to force a discussion on the now-dead 287(g) and the thought-of-as-friendlier Insecure Ethnicities programs.  Both programs are Latino-profiling programs in which City governments dump taxpayer money into Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and do the job of the agency.

Of course, we remember Toni Lawrence who stupidly blamed Latinos for the swine flu when a middle-class Mexican child died from the disease in one of our local hospitals.  Nevermind that it was a middle class Mexican child whose family could actually afford health care, and not the son of an immigrant.  Obviously, Lawrence was attempting to blame Mexicans for everything, as is the continuing (and losing) line of the Republican Party.

Clutterbuck, who for reasons unexplained to me enjoys support from “progressives” basically proved that she is a loyal to the Republican Party line.  And Mike Sullivan, who has sponsored the local Houston Area Latino Summit (which has questioned the use of 287(g)) is either worried about re-election and wants to score some points, or is thinking of higher office.  Frankly, as a barely-hanging-on supporter of Sullivan’s, I was rather disappointed and wished he would have kept it to issues that actually affect District E.

And what can we say about Lawrence?  She is running for County Commissioner and from what I hear, actually has signs up at Early Voting locations promoting her candidacy.  What better way to solidify the right-wing nutjob vote than to play to and promote their hate.

Gene Locke’s HPOU Mailer

Deep inside Miya Shay’s blog post on the negative turn the Locke campaign has taken toward Peter Brown is a sentence we really should be worrying about.

In addition, the folks at the Houston Police Officers Union are putting their muscle behind Locke.  The Union is sending out several mailers on behalf of Locke.  Many are targeting West-side Republicans.  One of the most powerful mail pieces set to go out soon features the widow of a slain Houston Police Officer.

Considering it includes the widow of the slain HPD cop, one has to question the contents of the mailer (I am sure I won’t be receiving it).  Does it promote 287(g)?  And does Gene Locke give yet another take on 287(g) and the Insecure Ethnicities program?

Thoughts on Viernes…10232009

In case you missed it…

Juliet Stipeche, Democrat for the 281st District Court, kicked off her campaign yesterday at Gravitas.  Dozens of colleagues, friends and family helped Juliet kick off a campaign that is sure to be among the most exciting on the March, 2010 ballot.

Juliet Stipeche Speaks to Supporters as her husband Wesley Nagorny Looks On

Juliet Stipeche Speaks to Supporters as her husband Wesley Nagorny Looks On

Kingwood’s Flat Participation

I am quite surprised at Kingwood’s participation rate, thus far, in this mayoral election.  I guess that’s why they call it the West Houston Republican strategy, huh?  As far as DC is concerned, I will be voting Saturday here in Kingwood.

More Later…maybe!

Event: Stipeche for Judge Announcement Party

Host: Juliet K Stipeche for Judge 281st District Court

Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009
Time: 5:30pm – 10:30pm
Location: Gravitas
Street: 807 Taft Street
City/Town: Houston, TX

LET’S MAKE A DIFFERENCE! LET’S JOIN JULIET’S CAMPAIGN!

You are cordially invited to Juliet K. Stipeche’s Campaign Announcement Party.

ANSWERING THE CALL FOR THE 281st CIVIL DISTRICT COURT
TO PROVIDE JUSTICE FOR THE PEOPLE

Thank you for your support, and I look forward to seeing you there!

If you would like to attend or be a member of the Host Committee, please RSVP to Juliet K. Stipeche at jstipeche@wnjs-law.com.

Contributions can be made on the day of the event. Credit card and PayPal contributions can be made at www.stipecheforjudge.com. Please make checks payable to the Juliet K. Stipeche Campaign and mail to 4314 Yoakum Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77006. (Texas law requires that I report the name, address, occupation and employer of every contributor, and the name, occupation and employer of any contributor’s spouse who is a member of a law firm. Please include this information with your contribution.)

Poli. Adv. Paid for by the Juliet K. Stipeche Campaign in compliance with the voluntary limits of the Judicial Campaign Fairness Act, Wesley Nagorny III, Treasurer

jstipeche@wnjs-law.com | www.stipecheforjudge.com
(713) 520-6667

Imm. Forum: A Bill Devoid of Wedge Amendments

From the National Immigration Forum:

Washington, DCYesterday, the Senate approved the conference report on the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Appropriations bill HR 2892. The adopted bill dropped some harsh immigration enforcement amendments that had been added to earlier versions of the bill by restrictionists, and also included immigration measures promoting immigrant integration and family unity. The bill now heads to the President to be signed into law.  The following is a statement by Ali Noorani, Executive Director of the National Immigration Forum, a non-partisan, non-profit pro-immigrant advocacy organization in Washington.

The Senate’s stamp of approval on a DHS appropriations bill devoid of restrictionist amendments is more evidence that Congress is getting ready to find a practical solution to our immigration troubles.  Common sense prevailed despite attempts by restrictionists to include ‘more of the same’ immigration enforcement-only provisions that purport to appear ‘tough on illegal immigration’ without a serious effort to fundamentally fix our broke immigration system.

Congress refused to waste more money on the ‘border fence to nowhere’ that has proven expensive and ineffective. We are pleased Congress is beginning to realize that a hard physical barrier on the border is not a serious response to an immigration system two decades out of date and in need of top-to-bottom reform.

The fact that E-Verify was reauthorized for three years as a voluntary program shows that Congress is not ready to embrace whole-heartedly a mandatory expansion of the program.  The databases on which this program relies on are seriously flawed and not ready for prime-time. A rapid-fire expansion of a flawed verification system would have devastating consequences on struggling small businesses and American workers and would likely drive workers from tax-paying, above-board work into the underground, black market, cash economy.

The Senate also demonstrated leadership and political will for immigration reform by supporting the Orphans, Widows and Widowers Protection Act, legislation that that will provide immense relief for immigrants who are not only suffering from the loss of loved ones, but are facing deportation as well.   We applaud the courageous efforts of Senator Menendez (D-NJ), Gillibrand (D-NY) , Nelson (D-FL)  and Leahy (D-VT) to ensure that this important family unity measure was included in the bill.

Finally, Congress recognized the importance of welcoming newcomers and incorporating them into the fabric of our society by approving an $11 million initiative for immigrant integration requested by President Obama. The funds will establish a new Immigrant Integration program in the Office of Citizenship at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

The serious work of drafting the top-to-bottom fixes we all know our immigration system needs remains before us, but the passage of the bill is a welcome sign that Congress is gearing up to seriously address achievable and workable comprehensive immigration reform.

BastaDobbs Press Conference-Houston

On Eve of ‘Latino in America’ Premiere, Join Us During Nation-Wide Press Events and Public Actions Planned to Demand CNN Dump Lou Dobbs. See below for events scheduled in 18 cities, one of which may be your town www.bastadobbs.com.

HOUSTON, TX
11:30 AM @Houston City Council
900 Bagby St. Houston, TX 77002
Contact:
Teodoro Aguiluz
CRECEN
teodoroaguiluz@hotmail.com
281-658-8201

Houston Council Member James Rodriguez (District I) will also participate.  Says Rodriguez, “The premier of ‘Latino in America’ will take us into the homes of individuals, some of who happen to be immigrants and show us first hand their daily strife to help America progress.  We must commend and embrace these contributions and reject divisive discussions such as those conducted everyday by Lou Dobbs,” Rodriguez said.

SAN ANTONIO, TX
12 PM NOON @ Esperanza
Peace & Justice Center
922 San Pedro, San Antonio,
TX 78212
Contact:
Graciela Sanchez
Esperanza Center for Peace
& Justice
esperanza@esperanzacenter.org
210-228-0201

Early Vote: Day 2

Thus far, over 8,000 folks have voted early in-person.  Including ballots mailed, it looks like it could amount to over 26,000 if they return the ballots. In reality, a little over 2,000 mail ballots have actually been submitted.

So how are things in District E?

Humble Instructional Center-Kingwood (224)

Octavia Fields Library-Humble (118)

Out in Clear Lake (338)

One impressive number is the Moody Park location which has neared 200, thus far.  The Met, though is almost at 1,000.

Things picked up a little today, so, let’s hope that trend continues.