Dem Endorsements…
DC was at an endorsement meeting last night. It was great doing some “floor management” rather than being a voting member. One of the things that amazes me is that some Dems still take consistent Primary voting so seriously. True, we can usually count on 35K to 50K voting in a Democratic Primary, but 2008 had us serving (and gladly, I might add) 400,000 who wanted to be Democrats. If one looks at these ID’d Dems’ voting records, one will find that some were brand new, while at the same time they had been consistent November “Straight D” voters.
So, when one of my favorite candidates who was recommended by this endorsing group was attacked by his opponent for not having voted in a Dem Primary (though he is one of those November “Straight D” votes, the group turned on him. It didn’t help that the threat of the parking garage closing had folks running out and then struggling to find a space. The thing is, the opponent who brought it up has actually voted in two Republican primaries.
So, when is a Democrat a Democrat? Someone please tell me, because if we’re going by supposed “party loyalty” only, instead of qualifications or even judicial temperament (and even personality, because some people have none), some folks got duped last night by quite a few candidates.
DosCentavos.net Endorsements
Since Monday is a bigger blog day, DC will be releasing his long list of endorsements on Monday. Of course, I have endorsed early in some races: Juliet Kathy Stipeche for the 281st and Chuck Silverman for the 157th. But it’s time for voters to know my two…well, you know.

Me showing excitement that the Observer actually ran the story. Thanks Observer!
We Made The Papers!
I take back all my negative thoughts of the Kingwood Observer. They ran a full-length story on the Joe Montemayor announcement for District 127.
Education This Week
I haven’t really commented on the whole “Fire to the Test” thing on the teachers. Frankly, and speaking as an HR guy, I think there needs to be a complete revamping of the evaluation system of teachers. Some argue that the test results are just one of thirty-something things, but the press behind seems to make the testing aspect more important than anything else. I have always been suspect of the “Education Reform” movement as I believe it funnels money to the corporate-educational complex that has created the whole charter school system. I disagreed with President Clinton and I disagree with President Obama when they place more weight on schools that serve a few hundred students, rather than improve the system for the vast majority of students. And teaching to a test is no lone way to determine a teacher’s success. There must be a happy medium.
In other news, Texas History is being re-written by the Republican Party. (No Mexicans Allowed).