Monthly Archives: July 2010

Thoughts on Viernes…07302010

Higher Ed Recommendations–Elitist?

Some of the recommendations coming out of a higher education advisory committee seem to show more desperation, which then turns into a lack of vision, and worse, provides an air of elitism. Among the recommendations that would be quite damaging is that of prioritizing recipients of need-based state grants by academic merit. Let’s face it, because Texas continues to teach to a test our kids are not leaving K-12 college-ready. Just look at the number of students required to take remedial courses. Anyone who does not see this as a crisis is out of touch with the realities of higher education, and that seems to include the THECB chief.

During Thursday’s discussion, Texas Commissioner of Higher Education Raymund Paredes wondered aloud whether community colleges – yoked with the burden of remedial education – could afford to keep their doors open to everyone.

“I am not suggesting students with meager academic skills should be excluded, but do we need to find some other way to deal with basic literacy and computation skills? The community college, as an institution of higher education, is not the appropriate place to deal with these issues,” Paredes said.

Well, of course not, K-12 should have taken care of that, but someone has to do the heavy lifting. But since community college systems are controlled locally, investment is easily curtailed by anti-tax groups which usually care less about educating the community. This blogger believes that the state should invest more in community colleges for the mere purpose of bringing students to college-level.

Another is a proposed requirement that 10% of a degree plan be completed outside of the classroom by way of internships and online courses. This seems more like a push for online education. As someone who completed a Master’s degree online, I am a strong believer in online education, but for undergrads? Successful completion of such a course requires maturity and a commitment that many undergrads do not have. But it is obvious what the main reasoning is.  As colleges and universities are about to experience a 5% cut, thanks to Gov. Rick Perry, and can expect another 5% cut in the near future, institutions are attempting to increase enrollment substantially in order to bring in added tuition revenue.

The bottom line:  Rick Perry has damaged Texas colleges and universities to a point where, if the damage continues, could affect our workforce creation efforts for the next generation. Now, higher education professionals and leaders are having to grasp at brittle straws which do little to improve quality, but do just enough to keep things afloat. Rick Perry is out of touch.

Riddle is Still At It

Yes, we know the story. Debbie Riddle is as hateful as she wants to be. Her Latino-targeted legislation is dangerous and would be costly, but she doesn’t care. She’s a wasteful waste of space. And YES, she has an opponent in Brad Neal.

Neal gave it a run in 2008, which allowed us to see a more realistic view of District 150 when voter participation increases. He’s doing it again in 2010 with the help of some good friends of mine, a shiny office which is set to open on the 14th of August, and the mere fact that Debbie Riddle continues her rampage against people short on defenses–the poor, minorities, etc. This is one race I’ll be following because District 150 is one of those districts with a rapidly changing demographic–an opportunity now and in the future.

Rick Perry:  A Failure at Mediocrity

That’s right, Rick Perry could care less about educating Texans and preparing them for the workforce. Forcing the issue of added cuts to state agencies, including Texas colleges and universities, Texas could cut as much as $108 million in student aid to appease Perry.

Just because Rick Perry strives for mediocrity (and fails at every attempt) doesn’t mean we need to follow him.  Vote Bill White for Governor!

More…Later!

Imagine him saying, “When the Mexicans Invaded Us…”

Actually, we’re already warehousing Latinos; it’s not much different than this video.

Local and Texas Reaction to SB1070 Decision

State Rep. Carol Alvarado, District 145:

“I agree with today’s ruling by District Judge Susan Bolton, temporarily striking down the most controversial parts of Arizona’s anti-immigrant law. This injunction is precisely what the checks and balances system of our government is supposed to accomplish.

I hope today’s ruling serves as a clear indication that all legislators should join together to push for Federal Comprehensive Immigration Reform. It is time for Congress to step up and face the difficult decisions we sent them to Washington to make. Other states, particularly Texas, cannot afford to make the same knee-jerk reactionary laws as Arizona did.

We need Comprehensive Immigration Reform that includes strengthened border security, and a fair, reasonable and affordable pathway to citizenship. This is not an issue that can be solved by individual states creating a patchwork of laws – there must be a federal response to the broken immigration system.”

Joe Montemayor, candidate for State Rep.-District 127

“With over a quarter-century of experience as a federal immigration agent, I agree with the federal government when it states that immigration enforcement is their job. And I agree with Judge Susan Bolton’s ruling which states that local law enforcement would be overburdened by attempting to do the job of the federal government. Congress needs to do its job and enact Comprehensive Immigration Reform so that Texas can avoid debating frivolous and burdensome laws.

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Gov. Jan Brewer have set a low standard for crime-fighting in Arizona:  increasing crime rates, low-rate of felony warrant arrests–all because they choose to play politics, rather than keep constituents safe. Texas Gov. Rick Perry and his Republican legislators will lower the bar again by throwing money at the crime problem, rather than developing effective solutions such as increasing our human intelligence capabilities to take down crime and smuggling organizations.

I will fight to keep our families and neighborhoods safe.”

State Senator Leticia Van de Putte (San Antonio)

“I am pleased that U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton blocked the most egregious parts of Arizona’s new immigration law. We must secure our borders, but not at the risk of racial profiling and the deprivation of civil rights.

Now is the time for Washington to act on comprehensive immigration reform so that we can end this era of fearful ignorance.”

State Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer (Chair, MALC)

When Debbie and I were first elected to the Texas House of Representatives, we both placed our hands on the Bible and swore to uphold the Constitution. What’s changed, Debbie? Do you only abide by your oath of office when politically convenient?
SB1070 does more harm than good and is a symbol of what can happen when people in power disregard the   Constitution in order to play partisan games. Governor Perry doesn’t want SB1070 in Texas. Neither does Speaker Straus or the rest of Debbie’s party.
It’s time to do the people’s business and not chase sound bites. Malicious, unconstitutional and fiscally irresponsible legislation, like SB 1070, is a waste of time and taxpayer dollars. In a time where the budget is $18 billion dollars light, we should be drafting legislation to solve real issues not chase our tails trying to get on Fox News.

State Rep. Armando Walle (District 140)

“Judge Bolton’s decision is a victory for opponents of S.B. 1070 who believe that it is wrong for states to highjack the federal government’s authority over immigration policy,” stated Representative Walle.  “This is a crucial first step that goes a long way to protect residents of Arizona against discrimination and unfair treatment.”

[...]

“Today’s decision is just the beginning of what will prove to be a lengthy and costly legal battle for the State of Arizona,” noted Rep. Walle.  “The cost of litigation, in addition to the devastating economic impact similar legislation would have on Texas, is an important reminder that Texas should oppose any efforts to implement such unconstitutional and discriminatory policies in our state.”

State Rep. Ana Hernandez (District 143)

“I applaud Judge Bolton’s ruling to temporarily strike down provisions of SB 1070, which would have resulted in a huge infringement of people’s civil liberties in Arizona. It is my sincere hope that today’s ruling will dissuade proponents of similar legislation from pursuing the same type of legislation in Texas. The immigrant community makes a significant positive economic impact to our state. In 2006, the Texas Comptroller’s Office reported that undocumented immigrants produce $1.58 billion in state revenue.

Our federal immigration system is broken, but implementing Arizona type legislation is not the answer. We need comprehensive immigration reform.”

Mayor Annise Parker (Houston)

“It was a bad idea in Arizona and it would be a bad idea in Texas,” she said Wednesday, in response to questions about the Arizona immigration law.

State Rep. Garnet Coleman

“It creates a stereotype not of just immigrants that may be undocumented but clearly of tax-paying, hard-working, church-going Americans,” Coleman said.

“Growing up African-American, I know what it is like to be suspect because of how you look, as opposed to having done anything wrong,” added Coleman.

Boyd Richie, Texas Democratic Party Chairman

“The Court’s decision protects the right of every American citizen to go about their daily lives without being considered a suspect simply because of the way they look or speak.

“Although Judge Bolton’s ruling blocked the provisions that would have resulted in the harassment of Hispanic-American citizens, Republican politicians and right wing commentators will escalate their efforts to use the Arizona law as an election year wedge issue.

“We won’t pass real immigration reform so long as politicians like Rick Perry keep trying to have it both ways,openly supporting the Governor of Arizona and then repudiating the Arizona bill when speaking to Hispanics. The best interests of all Americans require leaders who will put politics aside, respect the rights of all citizens and work for a real solution.”

If you have a response, please email doscentavos [at] gmail.com

Judge Holds Up Implementation of SB1070

Thanks to Clinton appointee, Judge Susan Bolton, it looks like the worse parts of SB1070 are at least on hold until the courts give the law further review.

The overall law will still take effect Thursday, but without the provisions that angered opponents — including sections that required officers to check a person’s immigration status while enforcing other laws.

The judge also put on hold parts of the law that required immigrants to carry their papers at all times, and made it illegal for undocumented workers to solicit employment in public places.

These were the most controversial and inhumane parts of the law, of course. There will be plenty of analysis, I’m sure, for the rest of the day and week.

Stay tuned.

As the SB1070 Legal Decision Looms…

There is little doubt that Latinos–citizen and non-citizen taxpayers-are keeping close watch to see what Judge Bolton decides on the Arizona Racial Profiling Legalization Law (SB1070). Whatever the decision could affect everything from voter participation in November to civil disobedience in the next few hours.

Syndicated columnist Ruben Navarrette has a scathing editorial on how the two major political parties have left Latinos in the lurch when it comes to immigration reform.

According to the Washington Post, Obama recently invited a small group of pro-immigrant activists to the White House and reassured them once more that he is committed to reform. But, he said, it would sure help if they stopped criticizing him publicly for dragging his feet. If they want to complain about someone, he said, they should take aim at Republicans.

This is high-grade cynicism. Instead of delivering for a loyal Democratic constituency that helped elect him, Obama dodges responsibility for his own failures and then tries to throw his critics off the scent by pointing them toward what he insists is the real obstacle to reform: the party that lost the White House two years ago and no longer controls Congress.

Meanwhile, Sheriff Arpaio is getting ready to bust some heads, it seems like.

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio says he’s “not going to put up with any civil disobedience” when the state’s new immigration law takes effect.

Arpaio says that if protesters want to block his jail, he’ll put them in it.

The uneasiness is in the air within the Latino community, no matter if one is in Arizona or elsewhere.

And the whiny people at Netroots Nations who were “paper checked” by mock ICE agents thought they felt threatened?

Damn Right We Better Be Worried

While we worry about growing the Latino electorate with fresh new voters we hope go “blue,” we also need to start worrying about eroding support from Latinos for President Obama.

For a group that supported Obama so heavily in 2008 and in his first year in office, only 43 percent of Hispanics surveyed said Obama is adequately addressing their needs, with the economy a major concern. Another 32 percent were on the fence, while 21 percent said he’d done a poor job.

That’s somewhat understandable, given that far more Hispanics have faced job losses and financial stress than the U.S. population in general.

But there’s an 8oo lb. gorilla in the room–immigration reform.

An unfulfilled promise to overhaul the nation’s patchwork immigration system, which Hispanics overwhelmingly want to see fixed, also may be to blame. That’s despite the fact that Obama is challenging an Arizona law that requires police, while enforcing other laws, to question a person’s immigration status if officers have a reasonable suspicion he or she is in the country illegally.

The thing is, this doesn’t necessarily translate into Republican votes, or even Latinos considering alternatives. We know where the Republican Party stands on Latinos. But as the big-money consultants in the Democratic Party tip-toe around immigration reform in an attempt to get some of our candidates East and West Texas rural support, there’s not much else being done, especially at the top of the ticket. Not only are Democrats turning “right” on immigration, or using tough-love language, to attract a certain segment of the community, it seems there isn’t much going on regarding outreach.

So, no, this doesn’t translate into Republican votes, but it does leave voters disillusioned with what is currently being offered by the other side. Whether it’s the “tough-love” or even Congressional Hispanic Caucus members balking at supporting a stand-alone DREAM Act that could increase interest in November voting, there isn’t a lot to get excited about.

We’ve already gone over the numbers from NALEO. How many more hints to we need?

No Shame: Zavala Co. Sheriff Turncoats on Democrats

Well, there were rumors that Eusevio Salinas, Zavala County’s Sheriff, could not be trusted as a loyal Democrat. After a press release battle in which Republican Rick Perry issued an endorsement list including a couple of possible “vendidos,” then Bill White campaign released a list that included the same two Sheriffs, it looks like Salinas has sold his soul to the devil–Rick Perry.

“I’d like to know who put me on that Bill White list. It isn’t right,” Salinas said. “I’m only on Rick Perry’s.”

Citing “border money,” most which actually came from the federal government, Salinas gave Perry credit for the infusion of cop cash.

And who could blame Salinas? He can count on Perry’s border-money-throw-away every couple of years, which then allows him to get the new and shiny SUVs and oversized pick-ups which don’t get much use, other than a funeral escort or…that’s about it. It’s not like Zavala County has been heard in the news as a place where there are huge smuggling caches taken down.

Of course, we can’t forget the big shootout, which we really haven’t gotten a final word about, to date. I wonder why?

I implore my friends from Cristal–get this guy out in 2012.

Apply for Mayor Parker’s Youth Council

If I was a youth (which was a few years ago), I’d definitely do this:

Mayor Annise Parker has announced that the 2010-11 Mayor’s Youth Council (MYC) is now taking applications.  The MYC emulates the Houston City Council with a chairperson (mayor), city secretary, nine district and five at-large council positions and their accompanying aides.

Youth Council members will gain an understanding of city departments and build rapport with community leaders, citizens and elected officials.  Members are called upon to help make decisions affecting Houston’s youth, as well as, participate in numerous activities throughout the year.  In addition, they will plan town hall meetings covering topics of interest and concern to their peers; participate in community service projects, both sponsored by the City of Houston and by other community organizations; and gather important input from other students through the annual Houston Youth Survey, the results of which are presented to City Council.

“We are looking to lay the foundation for our city’s future leaders,” said Mayor Parker. “High school students who are interested in helping their community should apply, and we hope they will learn valuable information about how the city works that can be relayed to their neighbors and friends.”

The MYC is directly overseen by its parent organization, the Volunteer Initiatives Program, an organization that promotes volunteerism across Houston. VIP director, Cameron M. Waldner, and associate director, Katherine Price, support the Mayor’s Youth Council in various projects throughout the year.

”Our goal is that every young man and woman leaves the Mayor’s Youth Council with a better understanding of civic duty and a moral responsibility to the community,” said Waldner.  “Even though they are a small group of 33 members, their actions have a far-reaching effect on the City of Houston.”

Guidelines and job descriptions for the 2010-11 terms are now available online.  Applicants must be high school students, who reside in the City of Houston, between the ages of fourteen (14) and eighteen (18).  They should demonstrate strong interests in gaining knowledge about city government and promoting discussion on youth-related issues, have excellent organizational skills and work well with young people from a variety of diverse cultures and backgrounds.  In addition, applicants must be sponsored by a teacher from their school’s social studies department.

Interested applicants are invited to apply online at www.houstontx.gov/myc. Applications are now being accepted and are due by midnight on Friday, September 10, 2010.  Incomplete applications will not be considered after this date.  A panel of youth and adult advisors will review the applications and invite qualified candidates for a personal interview.  Decisions will be announced in mid-September.

Bill White Earns Sheriff’s Endorsement

Bill White earned the nod of Texas Sheriffs, including the vast majority of border-area Sheriffs.

But who did Zavala County’s Sheriff endorse?  According to Matt Stiles at the Texas Tribune:

UPDATE (4:10 p.m.): The Perry campaign sent us signed endorsement cards from the Zapata and Zavala sheriffs. We haven’t heard back from the White campaign.

I know Zavala County Sheriff Eusebio Salinas and he’s pretty much been a good Democrat. A county that went 80+% for Obama, Ciro Rodriguez and most other Democrats, I doubt that he would endorse Rick Perry. I hope this gets cleared up.

Note:  DosCentavos was born and raised in Zavala County.

Of course, since Rick Perry is announcing that “Democrat Sheriffs” are endorsing him, the 2012 primary is going to get interesting.

Even so, if this is the case, then there are questions that need to be asked of our Democratic candidates; like, since you’re going to small town East and West Texas, are you bothering to go to small town South Texas, too?

Thoughts on Viernes…07232010

NALEO’s Polling

If Texas Democrats really want to know how Texas Mexican Americans and other Latinos are feeling, then this is the poll to read.  TEXAS FACTS:

  • Immigration has become one of our top issues.
  • 63% of us voted for Barack Obama
  • 72% of us approve of Obama’s job.
  • 61% of us think of ourselves as Democrat
  • 61.3% support BILL WHITE for GOVERNOR
  • 23.3% support Rick Perry
  • 48% think Perry is making an effort with Latinos
  • 56% think White is making an effort with Latinos
  • 50% feel that the immigration issue will make them more likely to vote in November
  • 30% of Texas Latinos consider themselves LIBERAL
  • 25.3 of Texas Latinos consider themselves MODERATE

Very interesting stuff which should give Bill White a clue worth considering  as he develops the messaging needed to energize Latino voters.  And if he needs help, he should give me a call.

The Makings of a Strategery?

Everyday as I drive in to downtown Houston, my trek takes me by the Sheriff’s Dept. Intake Facility.  And it seems like most days there are a few buses blocking traffic. The buses are from one of the non-union private jail contractors which take inmates (unconvicted and not) to other parts of the state as part of the County’s overcrowding solution. The buses are parked there awaiting the processing and chain-catching of the inmates. Although it doesn’t seem to take long to get them on the bus once they come outside, it does seem to take a while for the processing. Meanwhile, the buses just wait there–they aren’t even taken into the Sally Port–which fits one of those HUGE HCSO inmate buses.

Maybe if they get enough complaints, people will support the new jail? Is that the plan? As you can see, even the HCSO paddy wagon couldn’t wait–it cut in front of me!

Graduate in Four Years–Or Else!

Texas Senate Democrat Judith Zaffirini continues to force the issue on making Texas college students graduate in four years, without providing much in the form of ideas for college preparation, first-year experience/retention funding ideas, or much else.

She acknowledged that some students have valid reasons for taking longer to graduate.

“But your very traditional student should have those expectations,” she said. “If a student registers for 12 hours … there is no way that student is going to complete a four-year degree in four years.”

I wonder if Zaffirini even realizes that students of today are not the same students of her yesteryear. As colleges and universities diversify, the non-traditional aspect increases. More first-generation college students, more Texas DREAM Act beneficiaries, and because of out-of-control costs and a lower value in financial aid, more students having to work to pay for tuition and not just living expenses.

Zaffirini needs to come up with solutions, not notions that are truly not representative of her South Texas district.

Note:  DosCentavos is originally from Zaffirini’s district.

ENJOY THE WEEKEND

Whether you’re blockwalking for Democrats, attending a training to get Democrats elected, or calling your neighbors and telling them about Democrats, have a good and productive weekend!

Arguments Begin in USA vs AZ; GOP Loses Bid to Block Lawsuit

As arguments begin today before Judge Shelton in Arizona against the racial profiling law, a last effort by Senate Republicans to block the lawsuit failed, thanks to the Democratic majority and a couple of Republicans.

Senate Democrats on Wednesday turned back a move by Republicans to block the Justice Department from pursuing its lawsuit seeking to overturn Arizona’s controversial immigration law.

The bid by South Carolina Republican Jim DeMint to nix the lawsuit came out on the losing end of a 55-43 vote. Five Democrats voted to block the lawsuit while two Republicans voted against the measure.

Unfortunately, five Democrats were part of the mix wanting to block the lawsuit–the five that could get us to the Magic Number of 60 to pass CIR–or at least the DREAM Act.  I call them the problem children.  Still, given that the DREAM Act could have some bi-partisan appeal, we could lose those five, but not many more.

And just because we like to name names.

Democrats voting to block the lawsuit were: Max Baucus and John Tester of Montana; Mark Pryor and Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas; and Ben Nelson of Nebraska. Republicans Mike Johann of Nebraska and George Voinovich of Ohio broke with their party in voting against the amendment.

And while we fight in court, Janet Brewer’s legal mouthpiece had this to say to the judge.

“In Arizona we have a tremendous Hispanic heritage. To think that everybody that’s Hispanic is going to be stopped and questioned … defies reality,” Bouma said. “All this hypothetical that we’re going to go out and arrest everybody that’s Hispanic, look around. That’s impossible.”

Somehow, that doesn’t make me feel all warm and fuzzy.

Stop SB1070! – No SB1070 in Texas!