Category Archives: Count Me!

Reminder: Tacos y Votes – Saturday, May 19

Tacos y Votes

Spread the Word: May 1st March!

Re-Committing To Voter Registration

There’s no doubt that 2012 is weighing heavily on our minds. With Republican-led voter suppression efforts becoming law around the country, the intent of these efforts is obvious. It’s what we don’t see that we should be worried about, according to my good friend Stan Merriman, who had this op-ed in the Chron.

The Harris County tax assessor-collector has re-created the equivalent of a regressive poll tax by maximizing the time and travel costs of voting. He forces most voters in Harris County to reapply over and over. He then decides whether to allow a citizen to remain on the registration rolls by a secretive purging operation that, even after the lawsuits by the Democratic Party mentioned in the Jan. 30 article, remains largely obscured from public scrutiny. No increase in the voter rolls for this dynamic and growing community is the result.

The Tax Office suspends or cancels voter registrations based on something like a credit check. The office calls it a live check; it sends personal identification information into a so-called “fusion center” and, from there, to where nobody will say. In any case, the unreliable information returned from various sources is used to disqualify or misdirect voters. This is not subject to audit and barely subject to appeal. You the voter just show up at the polls to discover when it is too late to do anything about it that you are not qualified to vote. Just making a simple change of address is difficult and risks cancellation. Voter registration in Harris County is really a lifetime reregistration process costing millions their right to vote and the county millions of dollars.

Many believe new voter identification rules will suppress turnout, but whatever effect they may have is dwarfed by the huge voter suppression caused by our registration process.

There are solutions.

He goes on to give some simple, common sense solutions, so read the rest of the article.

Meanwhile, a voter group has filed a lawsuit against the state of Texas for some of these practices.

The latest lawsuit filed in the Southern District of Texas courts names Texas Secretary of StateHope Andrade and takes aim at the state’s new mandatory training for all volunteer registrars – in which almost anyone who handles a voter’s application as part of a registration drive has to complete training before he or she can be “deputized” to operate in any Texas county. A spokesman for Andrade refused comment.

Population growth in Texas exceeds most other states, while many voter registration rolls throughout the state remain stagnant. As of January, 12.9 million Texans had registered to vote -up just 2 percent from January 2008.

There’s no doubt that this is all part of a pattern to suppress voting opportunities for Texans across the political spectrum. Through some spies, I’m hearing of other things that may be launched soon to cut folks off the rolls. I’m sure we’ll be hearing more about this in the near to not-so-distant future.

More than ever, voter registration will play a major role in the 2012 elections. It’s time to recommit to ensuring Texans remain on the rolls.

It’s time to “true the democracy,” don’t you think?

Stay connected!

The Shift: Hispanics in America

This vid I came upon today was produced by the Center for Hispanic Leadership, which has a commitment to creating Hispanic Talent. Warning to Tea Partiers – Your head may fall off after watching this.

COH: Redistricting In A Squeaker!

Redistricting and adding two new seats to Houston City Council now moves forward.

Why didn’t this Kingwood Democrat attend Kingwood’s immigrant & annexation bashing session, also known as Kingwood’s District E redistricting forum? Given the outcome on Item 26 (and thanks to Greg for some great play-by-play) it was going to move forward.

Besides, I’ve had enough of the anti-annexation whining already, and I really don’t mind Kingwood and Clear Lake being lumped together as any move toward separating them would dilute minority voting strength in neighboring areas. And furthermore, I can read the local Mexican bashing in the two newspapers we have in the ‘Wood.  (Or I’ll read how my State Rep. is one of the sponsors of HB-12 and wants to internally sonogram women ). Nuff said.

Now, let’s get to the real debate. Who gets these districts?

Houston Votes: Democracy At Its Best

I had the privilege of meeting with staff members of Houston Votes, a local organization well on its way to meeting a goal of registering 100,000 voters in Harris County.  Houston Votes is sponsored by the organization Texans Together Education Fund, a nonpartisan 501 (c) 3 that engages the historically disengaged in Harris County.

In 2008, Houston Votes tested its abilities registering 24,000 lower income residents, which in turn produced a 65% turnout. In Harris County, there are 600,000 eligible, yet unregistered, potential voters and Houston Votes and its partners have committed the resources necessary to getting the job done.

As Houston Votes tells us very frankly, it has five prongs:  Public Awarness, Storefront Voter Registration, Door-to-Door Registration, Non-Partisan turnout, and strict compliance.

And they aren’t joking, either. Founder Fred Lewis, a voter rights advocate, is quite serious when he speaks about being compliant and especially non-partisan.  They know where the voters are–in 285 low turnout precincts–and their job is to bring out new registrants.  There is no “voter info” sharing with partisan groups, and, if anything, they take voter engagement quite seriously.

As Lewis told me, engaged community members make for a healthier community.

What this blogger enjoyed the most about this organization is that it has brought in staff members from “the outside,” to lead the ground effort. Highly qualified individuals who have been effective in other parts of the United States and are up to the challenge of meeting the group’s goals.

While previous nonpartisan efforts have been challenged as partisan by one political party or another because of those involved or in the lead, Houston Votes is effectively avoiding the “taint,” in that it is serious about its work.

Frankly, I find the organization that much impressive.  As partisan as I am, I think engaging people–whether it’s for the ballot box or for the purpose of engaging entire neighborhoods in various governmental processes, is more important.

I am reminded of that good ol’ notion of PAR–Participatory Action Research–which is usually avoided by political parties in fear that it will only grow the universe of voters. But it works if done correctly.

Anyway, Houston Votes is having a kick-off party on Thursday at 6PM at the Pearl Bar on Washington.  I’ll be there taking a few pics and celebrating their jump start to reaching their goal. Join me!

For now, check out this video to help reach the Latino community that is unregistered.

iHazte Contar! Census Arrives This Week

The Chron has reported it and folks are already working on making sure we all count.

Aqui estan dos videos que explican la verdad sobre el Censo.

El Censo y Los Indocumentados

La Importancia del Censo Para Los Latinos

Congressional Redistricting: Blame it on Latinos

A report by the America’s Voice Educational Fund states that three of the four Congressional seats Texas stands to gain can be chalked up to Latino population growth.  Rio Grande Guardian provides us this article.

The report, produced by America’s Voice Education Fund, shows that Latinos comprise 63 percent of the population growth in Texas since 2000. Of the eight states likely to gain congressional seats, Texas has seen the highest percentage of Latino population growth

State Rep. Aaron Peña stated the Valley’s case for one of those seats.

“This report confirms what we here in South Texas have been saying all along. Texas stands to gain at least four congressional seats because of the explosion in population in communities like ours. Clearly, at least one of these seats belongs in South Texas,” Peña said.

“We see that growth and vitality everyday in our schools, our neighborhoods and our businesses. The 2010 Census and the redistricting process is going to be profoundly affected by our community and many like it across the state and nation.”

Peña said that in the coming months it is “vitally important” that South Texas takes an “aggressive stance in counting every individual in our growing community so that state and federal resources are fairly apportioned.”

And it’s not just in Texas.  It is pretty obvious that Latinos are everywhere!

Using Census projections by Election Data Services, Inc., the AVEF report shows that 19 states are poised to see changes in their Congressional representation after Census 2010, with eight states gaining seats and 11 states losing seats.

Kimball Brace, president of the bipartisan firm Election Data Services, Inc., whose firm’s reapportionment projections provided the foundation for the report, said the report makes it clear that Latino residents are a driving force behind increased political power in the states poised to gain representation in Congress, and are helping to stem further losses in states that are poised to lose seats following the 2010 Census.

These numbers, though, show it is very obvious that Latinos are not producing as well as we should be, politically.  Blame it on the political parties, blame it on the campaigns, blame it on current office holders who do little to energize voters, take your pick.

The report also looks at Latino voting trends. In Texas, there were 2,441,000 Latino voters registered in 2008. Of these, 1,697,000 voted that year. The percentage growth of Latino registered voters from 2000 to 2008 was 28.14 percent. The percentage growth of Latino voter turnout from 2000 to 2008 was 30.54 percent. In 2000, the Latino share of the total vote in Texas was 18.56 percent. In 2008, that figure had risen to 20.12 percent.

In a section titled Why It Matters, the report says that the 2010 will reveal the “surging political power of Latinos in America.” The results will likely show that Texas may become “more like California,” in terms of the “backfiring illegal immigration wedge strategy” the report states.

We can gain all the Congressional seats we want, but Latinos in turn need to produce votes; especially in Texas.  I’m looking forward to seeing numbers beyond Texas, which show that Latinos made the difference in winning the election in those states for President Obama.

Houston Latinos

My friend and Facebook buddy Ben Mendez has been working on some biographies of some of the more prominent Latinos in Houston.  Here are links to PDFs (Adobe Acrobat required) for you all to enjoy.

Leonel Castillo A Man With A Vision
http://www.nhpo.us/leadership/bios/leonelcastillo.pdf

Greg Compean The King Maker
http://www.nhpo.us/leadership/bios/gregcompean.pdf

Felix Fraga An Icon Of The East End
http://www.nhpo.us/leadership/bios/felixfraga.pdf

SCOTUS: Republican Railroading Must Be Reviewed

Here’s a press release from Lone Star Project:

In a near unanimous decision released earlier today, the US Supreme Court ruled in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. Holder (08-322) that political jurisdictions covered under the Voting Rights Act must continue to seek approval from the Justice Department before making changes in election procedures. As a result, major changes to Texas election law, specifically a Voter Photo ID requirement and the 2011 redistricting plans, will be subject to review and approval by the Obama Justice Department.

The Court did expand the type of jurisdictions that could request the right to “bailout” of the pre-clearance requirements. Prior to the Court’s decision, only a  “State or political subdivision” was allowed to seek approval from the Washington, DC District Court to be relieved from pre-clearance requirements.   The term “political subdivision” was previously defined to include “counties, parishes, and voter-registering subunits.” In the decision today, the “bailout” option was expanded to include all governmental subdivisions including Municipal Utility District’s like the one in Austin that sought Supreme Court relief. In its decision, the Court said, “We therefore hold that all political subdivisions that – not only those described in Section 14 (c)(2) – are eligible to file a bailout suit.”

The decision is especially important given that new Legislative and Congressional District lines will be drawn in 2011. This will be the first redistricting cycle that plans will be reviewed by a Democratic Justice Department. In 2003, the harshly partisan and now disgraced Bush Justice Department ignored professional Voting Rights experts and approved the DeLay mid-decade congressional redistricting plan, even though the experts cited several specific violations of the Voting Rights Act.

This is definitely good news.  Although the conservative court, didn’t want to go there, the focus of the decision was not as broad as a Voter Rights advocate would hope. Still…

Debo Adegbile, the NAACP Legal Defense and Edicational Fund lawyer who argued for the preservation of the law at the high court, said, “The fact is, the case was filed to tear the heart out of the preclearance provision of the Voting Rights Act and that effort failed today.”

The lone dissenter was Justice Clarence Thomas, who also kept his definition of Voter Rights very narrow.

“The violence, intimidation and subterfuge that led Congress to pass Section 5 and this court to uphold it no longer remains,” Thomas said.

Yes, but what about run-away Voter Registration offices whose staff members purge voter lists, then sell them for personal profit?

I guess we’re getting a bit broad there.