Category Archives: Houston Dems ’12

MALDEF’s 2012 Latino State of the Union

Got an hour and 12 minutes? Check this out.

Never Again…

Democrats love to talk about all the good FDR did, but on this day, we must remember the bad he and the US Government also did.

WASHINGTON, Feb. 20 – By executive order today President Roosevelt gave the Army authority to establish military zones anywhere in the United States from which any person, citizen or alien, may be evacuated and excluded.

The order is expected to go into effect in California and the Pacific Coast states as rapidly as conditions permit. No other geographical sections of the country are at present included.

Those chiefly affected are American citizens of Japanese parentage. Approximately 60,000 of those reside in California and an additional 14,000 are scattered through Oregon and Washington.

Unfortunately, remnants of these kinds of actions still exist, such as anti-immigrant policies like 287(g) and Secure Communities. Both of these “modern” policies are as flawed as FDRs Executive Order in that many innocent people have ended up, as President Obama’s Hispanic mouthpiece once stated, “collateral damage.” Not to mention that these policies are just wrong.

Of course, our Sheriff doesn’t want to let go of the same failed program either. Continuing these programs, thus funneling tax money into the private prison industry and replicating programs, is irresponsible and a waste. Scoring political points on the backs of entire communities is not an option if one wants to be victorious in 2012.

Remnants of FDRs atrocity remain in my hometown of Crystal City, TX. And the Japanese community dedicated a marker years ago on the site where a Japanese concentration camp once stood.

“This marker is situated on an original foundation of a two-family cottage as a reminder that the injustices and humiliations suffered here as a result of hysteria, racism, and discrimination never happen again.”

“Never again.”  It rings out loudly, unfortunately, there is a lot of work to be done.

Vamos Pa’ Charlotte!

Or is it Obamanos Pa’ Charlotte?

Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz will nominate Los Angeles Mayor, Antonio Villaraigosa Permanent Chair of the 2012 Democratic National Convention. DNC Chair Wasserman Schultz’s nomination of Mayor Villaraigosa will be presented to the Convention Rules Committee and then voted on by the delegates to the 2012 Convention at the opening session. Share convention ideas at http://www.demconvention.com/share-ideas.asp.

En Español

Chimichanga Follow-up: El Tony to Chair the DNC Confab

Yes, he’s LA Mayor Antonio Villarraigosa, but I call him “El Tony.” El Mayor is going to get a national spotlight on him by being the Chair of the 2012 Democratic Convention.

As convention chairman, Villaraigosa will wield the gavel during the event in Charlotte, N.C., which opens with a festival on Sept. 3 and continues for three days of official business, including the nomination of Obama and his acceptance speech.

Villaraigosa will also serve as a spokesman for the convention, starting with a Web video the party planned to release on Wednesday.

Villaraigosa is one of the nation’s most prominent elected Latino officials and envisions an active role in Obama’s reelection effort. The White House, in turn, is counting heavily on strong Latino turnout, especially in battleground states such as Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico and Florida.

This is good for America. And also for América.

About the only way to mess this up is for the Dem show-planners to send him out on stage dressed like a mariachi with a huge sombrero. I can already see the book-title on El Mayor’s life, With a Chimichanga in His Hand:  The Ballad of El Tony V. (Apologies to  Américo Paredes.)

All joking about new-found sensitivity by Republicans on Latinos aside, this should be a treat.

The 2012 Chimichanga Debate

In case you haven’t heard, an Obama aide offered a line borrowed from a Washington Post article by Dana Milbank, and now Republicans are trying to pile on Obama for it.

“Line of the day from WAPO’s Dana Milbank: “The chimichanga? It may be the only thing Republicans have left to offer Latinos.”

Milbank ended his Wednesday column that analyzed the Republican Party’s treatment of the Latino voting bloc with the line. He borrowed the reference from Sen. John McCain, who he quoted earlier in the story.

Frankly, I don’t think it’s insensitive. I think they give Republicans too much credit for offering something to a group of people in need of jobs and better opportunities. In other words, the sentiment is accepted, but let’s get real. Any offer of anything to Latinos by Republicans is laughable.

Insulting is Republicans trying to play nice after leaders in states like Arizona, Texas, New Mexico, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, etc., have offered up punitive policies that can only be deemed racist and anti-Latino.

On to real issues.

Redistricting Today: SD10 and Other Negotiations

Looks like the plaintiffs and the State of Texas have agreed to the SD-10 map, which will stay somewhat favorable for current State Senator Wendy Davis. So, that’s one part of the lawsuit that seems to be done.

Ramsey at the Trib has something, as well as some play-by-play from the rest of the morning. The rest of the maps (Texas House and Congressional) still remain in negotiations. Follow Michael Li’s tweets at Twitter.com/mcpli for the latest.

While some of us have seen some of the bickering and arguing through press releases and even some punches being thrown through Facebook and Twitter, what about the judges? According to Ramsey,

The Texas judges — 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Jerry Smith of Houston, and federal judges Orlando Garcia and Xavier Rodriguez of San Antonio — have to guess what their colleagues in a Washington, D.C.s court might do. The Washington court is deciding whether the maps enacted by the Legislature undermine existing power of minority voters. Without a ruling from that court, the Texas judges have to guess at what might be in a ruling, and to incorporate that with their own judgment about other aspects of the maps. They’re working to put interim maps into place that can be used this year, with the understanding that there will probably be more remapping ahead.

Yeah, pobrecitos.

UPDATE:  Plan on May 29 Primary, Says Judge Smith

Wow! May 29th would basically make Texas Republicans insignificant in the Presidential primary. Or at least, not a catalyst for any given candidate. Still, the negotiations over the Congressional and Texas House maps continue. Keep an eye on the internets and the Tweeters for the latest.

Third Centavo: The Texas LULAC Position on The Deal

by Joe Cardenas, III, ED of Texas LULAC

DC NOTE:  After reading much criticism about “the deal,” I sought out Joe to provide a bit more clarification. With so many press releases and comments flying about, I thought it fair to have a clearer view of things from this other side of the debate. If someone on the other side wants to clarify their position, by all means send it in for equal time.

I write this as an attempt to clarify a lot of misinformation that is casting a shadow of doubt on the sincere efforts of Texas LULAC to reach a satisfactory conclusion to redistricting.  Remember that we belong to a coalition of seven organizations called the Texas Latino Redistricting Task Force who organized for the sole purpose of garnering the best possible redistricting plans in the Congress and State House for Latino representation after the Texas Legislature adopted maps that not only failed to give Latinos any additional representation, but that purposely weakened Latino opportunity districts or did away with the viability of Latino preferred candidates.  From the on start, we have been fighting a two-front battle to get what we lost and to increase our representation in the Congress and State House.  That the Texas Attorney General has given its approval of maps that give our community back what it had lost and an increase in representation through Latino opportunity districts is a victory for all Texans!

Our fight in the courts is going well, but the timeframe provided by the court in D.C., makes it likely that Texas will have a split primary that will cost counties throughout the state money that they don’t have and confusion that will keep many from voting; it is estimated that a split primary will cost 15 to 20 million dollars. It is for this reason that the court in San Antonio has urged all parties to negotiate among themselves a plan that is acceptable and in keeping with the voting rights act and the instructions by the Supreme Court; furthermore, and most importantly, Texas LULAC and the Task Force applaud the State’s position that these maps are acceptable for the decade!  Removing redistricting from the state legislative agenda ensures that we can concentrate on the educational issues of the state.

But be warned, there are many detractors who are against Texas LULAC and the Task Force for various reasons stemming from their own lack of foresight.  I have seen the comments and emails from friends in the Democratic party criticize our willingness to support plans that accomplish our goal and provide a springboard to addressing the issue of education for all; I have also witnessed the criticism of Republicans who question whether the Attorney General has the power to agree on a set of plans at this stage of the game.  We have also read various newspaper articles that falsely read that the court has rejected these plans.  Let me be very clear on these naysayers: We are not in the business of protecting the incumbency of any politician whether they are a Democrat or a Republican!  Nor does the argument that some have been left out change our position, for in the end, the only group who matters is the Latino community of Texas.  We do what we do because the Latino community of Texas as a whole will benefit regardless of what some might say.  Texas LULAC will not play politics with the education of our children!

We have an opportunity to support plans that will ensure our community additional representation while removing redistricting from the legislative agenda, all in the spirit of compromise!

Brothers and Sisters, by all accounts, this is a victory, a hard fought victory!  Texas LULAC was the only organization to be present at every state redistricting hearing; it was Texas LULAC that was consistently present in Austin at the hearings; it was Texas LULAC that helped create a Task Force to represent the Latino community.  And, it was Texas LULAC who elected to have MALDEF as its legal representation in order to ensure that the best possible case could be made on behalf of the Latino community of Texas.  We have forced the state to reconsider its stance, and we are on the verge of a victorious compromise that will politically change the way politics are done in Texas.  From this point on the Latino community of Texas is not beholden to any one political party or politician!  We as a community have achieved a level of political maturity that will translate into political power from now on.  You must be willing to stand firm on this compromise that many do not want, but for which so much is at stake.

As a teacher of Government, I often cringe at the politics of D.C. and the inability of our politicians to make decisions for the people rather than for their own self-interests.  Today, we in Texas LULAC find ourselves in a similar situation: do we do what is in the best interest of the people of Texas, or do we bend to the interests of the politicians and their friends? Somewhere along the way, politicians forgot that our nation was forged in the art of compromise for the common good. While we do not agree with all aspects of the proposed plans, they do accomplish our goals, so that we can concentrate on the educational issues of fair-funding, high-stakes testing, and the state’s structural deficit.  We have been given the opportunity to move beyond the issue of redistricting in a satisfactory manner.  Now is the time to do so by again taking the lead in spite of what criticism may come.  In the end, time will prove that our choice was the right choice; and History will remember that it was Texas LULAC that led the way!

Last Night’s RomTinos

I just watched an interview on CBS between Charlie Rose and the guy who will probably start working on voice-overs calling himself “Meat” (that’s Mitt with a Spanish accent) stating he will be seeking the Hispanic vote, since he received over 1/2 of the Latino vote in the Florida Primary. There’s just one problem with that logic–the rest of American Latinos are not right-wing Cubanos.

Now, nothing against Cubanos. Those who have received automatic amnesty upon arrival give other Latino immigrants something for which to hope. But they tend to vote Republican, anyway. The reality is that, even with some growth in activity, Hispanics made up 15% of the Republican Primary in La Florida, according to some exit polling. Chalk it up to their continued self-loathing love affair with Marco Rubio, perhaps millions spent on TV ads, and “Meat’s” sudden change of heart with his “blood for papers” DREAM Act revelation.

Romney seems to have come out of Florida with some cockiness, senselessly attacking President Obama, yet already calling out the Obama Campaign for “vitriol” that hasn’t even been scripted, much less made it to the the video editor. I guess that’s his strategy to become the “nice guy” by default.

But as Newt told us last night, there are 46 states to go. The media will play Romney (or is that overplay?) as the guy to beat, and Mitt will get himself a lot of free advertising. Let’s not even state the obvious–that Mitt could not even manage 50% last night among “conservatives.” He may become the chosen among GOPers, but surely not by default.

By the end of February, the GOPers will have gone through Nevada, Colorado, and Arizona, where Republicans aren’t Latino-friendly and where there are plenty of Latinos. And, no Cuban GOPers–or, at least, not as many. Either the GOPers will move on toward Super Tuesday badly damaged in the eyes of Hispanic voters, or quite flawed in the eyes of their own GOP voters for pandering to Hispanics in one way or another.

So, let Romney talk. Let him think that his anti-immigrant, anti-opportunity agenda is well-loved by Latinos. Either way, what comes out of his mouth will make for good ads and YouTubes.

Let’s just make sure progressives have a strong response.

Republican Attack on Women Continues

Looks like the Komen folks have folded to pressure from the right wing to stop funding breast cancer screenings at Planned Parenthood. Republicans and anti-Woman extremists are to blame for this latest political hit-job on women in America.

Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, has depicted Stearns’ probe as politically motivated and said she was dismayed that it had contributed to Komen’s decision to halt the grants to PPFA affiliates.

“It’s hard to understand how an organization with whom we share a mission of saving women’s lives could have bowed to this kind of bullying,” Richards told The Associated Press. “It’s really hurtful.”

Planned Parenthood has been a perennial target of protests, boycotts and funding cutoffs because of its role as the largest provider of abortions in the United States. Its nearly 800 health centers nationwide provide an array of other services, including birth control, testing for sexually transmitted diseases, and cancer screening.

According to Planned Parenthood, its centers performed more than 4 million breast exams over the past five years, including nearly 170,000 as a result of Komen grants.

As a Latino, I’m appalled that the right wing would attack an organization whose purpose is to provide access to health care screenings to those without access; and this especially includes Latinas. Unfortunately, I’m not surprised.

For Latinos, the 2012 elections are about a lot more than just immigration reform. Access to health care, jobs, the economy, education–everything the Republicans are seeking to destroy–are what 2012 is about.

Professor Acuna Sounds Off on Arizona

Dr. Rodolfo Acuña, Professor Emeritus of History at Cal-State Northridge, sounded off in The Progressive on Arizona’s recent banning of Mexican American studies courses, books, and materials, asking the question:  When do you start to count?

When the great Muhammad Ali was asked how many sit-ups he did, he responded, “I don’t count my sit-ups. I only start counting when it starts hurting. That is when I start counting, because then it really counts. That’s what makes you a champion.”

These words resonate in Tucson, where Latina/o students are fighting for an education by sitting-in in the office of Tucson Unified School District Superintendent of Schools John Pedicone, walking out of classes, demonstrating, and taking to the streets.

Students are dispelling the myth that Mexican Americans do not care about education; they have started counting because it hurts. They know the difference between having subject matter that is relevant and having those books warehoused, between having teachers who believe in what they are teaching and sitting through classes where teachers go through the motions.

Read the rest here.

I agree with Professor Acuña when he says that the purpose of this is to intimidate other groups who may want to fight back against injustice. And as he says, this is about keeping Mexicans in their place–without a sense of history, without a sense of self. When liberals begin to realize what this is all about, then we can have a conversation about “Latino outreach” in politics. Otherwise, we’re just grasping at whatever is left.