Category Archives: LatinoVote ’12

Time Makes March All About Latinos

It’s not Fiestas Patrias. It’s a couple of months before Cinco de Mayo. What gives with a March Time cover?

Courtesy of Time Magazine

Time Magazine seems to think that Latinos will have a major impact on the election in November, and the cover for their March issue is the result. I like it!

Utilizing photos by Marcos Grob of Arizona voters, Time features a Q&A with Florida right-winger Marco Rubio. Also featured, and what I look forward to reading, is a commentary by Univision’s Jorge Ramos who will write on how Latinos feel isolated by either party. And finally, the featured article is by Micheal Scherer on the impact of Latinos from Arizona in 2012.

For the Obama campaign nationwide, “expanding the electorate” increasingly means “expanding the Latino electorate.” If Obama is able to win heavily-Latino Western states like Nevada, Colorado and Arizona, he could still win in the electoral college even if he loses historically key states in the industrial Midwest like Ohio and Wisconsin. “If we do our grassroots stuff right on the ground in all these Western states, which we will, because it’s something we are good at,” Obama campaign manager Jim Messina told me, “we could seriously change the outcome.”

At the same time, Republicans have generally done a dismal job through the primary of appealing to Latino voters. George W. Bush won more than 40% of the community in 2004, but in a recent Latino Decisions poll conducted for Univision, 72% of Latinos said the GOP either did not care about their support or was hostile to their community. The 27% who sensed hostility represented a seven point increase from April of 2011, when the same pollsters asked the question. “Conservatives have not realized how their tone and rhetoric has turned people off,” says Jennifer Korn, who led George W. Bush’s Latino outreach effort in 2004.

Supposedly, Marco Rubio will be the right-winger trying to soften the blow, but his failure to support comprehensive immigration reform tells me any change in him is mostly cosmetic, and therefore any change by the GOP will be mostly his leftovers.

That said, Scherer does make a point here:

So in the days remaining before the Arizona primary, pay close attention to how the GOP Presidential candidates talk about immigration. They have little to gain from Republicans by pivoting to softer rhetoric, but they have much to gain in the general election.

And have you noticed that, up until today, it’s been all about Obama’s Christianity and the attack on women? Is that the actual Latino strategy at work?

These stories will appear in the March 5 issue of TIME, which will be released online Thursday and hit newsstands Friday, February 24.

Supremes to Decide Affirmative Action: A Perfect Storm

It really does look like a perfect storm–well-coordinated and perfectly positioned, time-wise.

The Supremes will take on the issue of Affirmative Action at colleges and universities in the fall–around the time of the elections. It is scary to think that the Supreme Court could have a hand in turning back the clock; however, the attack against diversity is nothing new.

Ever since Dumbocrat AG Dan Morales opened the door to attack through his awful interpretation of Hopwood, the right-wing has been relentless. Any white kid who didn’t get into UT was given the right to blame any brown or black kid for blocking them from attending, it seemed. Forget that ones experiences could make that person a better candidate, or yes, even forget that Texas was becoming a lot more diverse, particularly when it comes to college admissions.

Back to the perfect storm, the Supremes are already taking on some hot topics regarding diversity, so “race” will be in the news from now on as arguments and opinions fly about. What adds to the worry is this:

But there have been changes in the Supreme Court since then. For one thing, Justice Samuel Alito appears more hostile to affirmative action than his predecessor, Sandra Day O’Connor. For another, Justice Elena Kagan, who might be expected to vote with the court’s liberal-leaning justices in support of it, is not taking part in the case.

Kagan’s absence probably is a result of the Justice Department‘s participation in the Texas case in the lower courts at a time when she served as the Obama administration’s solicitor general.

I can already see the responses or excuses, like “we are colorblind,” or “we don’t need it anymore,” or “things are better, you should be happy with that.”

And those are just the nicer ones. Don’t even read the comments in the Chron

Ultimately, this just shows how important elections really are. There is no sense in waiting to see what the decision may be; it’s just time to get out the vote!

MALDEF’s 2012 Latino State of the Union

Got an hour and 12 minutes? Check this out.

Vamos Pa’ Charlotte!

Or is it Obamanos Pa’ Charlotte?

Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz will nominate Los Angeles Mayor, Antonio Villaraigosa Permanent Chair of the 2012 Democratic National Convention. DNC Chair Wasserman Schultz’s nomination of Mayor Villaraigosa will be presented to the Convention Rules Committee and then voted on by the delegates to the 2012 Convention at the opening session. Share convention ideas at http://www.demconvention.com/share-ideas.asp.

En Español

Where Things Stood After the Lege Messed Up on Redistricting

Back when the Texas Legislature failed to come up with some maps that were not discriminatory, particularly toward Latinos, it was the Texas Latino Redistricting Task Force that did a mini-tour of the state to take their message to the media.

SomosTejanos.org was actually at the Houston press conference back then. So, we decided to compare the video to the outcome known as “the deal,” which is now being negotiated further in SA (as far as the interim maps go). It’s a good historical record of where things stood at that time. Did things change much from then to now?

Chimichanga Follow-up: El Tony to Chair the DNC Confab

Yes, he’s LA Mayor Antonio Villarraigosa, but I call him “El Tony.” El Mayor is going to get a national spotlight on him by being the Chair of the 2012 Democratic Convention.

As convention chairman, Villaraigosa will wield the gavel during the event in Charlotte, N.C., which opens with a festival on Sept. 3 and continues for three days of official business, including the nomination of Obama and his acceptance speech.

Villaraigosa will also serve as a spokesman for the convention, starting with a Web video the party planned to release on Wednesday.

Villaraigosa is one of the nation’s most prominent elected Latino officials and envisions an active role in Obama’s reelection effort. The White House, in turn, is counting heavily on strong Latino turnout, especially in battleground states such as Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico and Florida.

This is good for America. And also for América.

About the only way to mess this up is for the Dem show-planners to send him out on stage dressed like a mariachi with a huge sombrero. I can already see the book-title on El Mayor’s life, With a Chimichanga in His Hand:  The Ballad of El Tony V. (Apologies to  Américo Paredes.)

All joking about new-found sensitivity by Republicans on Latinos aside, this should be a treat.

The 2012 Chimichanga Debate

In case you haven’t heard, an Obama aide offered a line borrowed from a Washington Post article by Dana Milbank, and now Republicans are trying to pile on Obama for it.

“Line of the day from WAPO’s Dana Milbank: “The chimichanga? It may be the only thing Republicans have left to offer Latinos.”

Milbank ended his Wednesday column that analyzed the Republican Party’s treatment of the Latino voting bloc with the line. He borrowed the reference from Sen. John McCain, who he quoted earlier in the story.

Frankly, I don’t think it’s insensitive. I think they give Republicans too much credit for offering something to a group of people in need of jobs and better opportunities. In other words, the sentiment is accepted, but let’s get real. Any offer of anything to Latinos by Republicans is laughable.

Insulting is Republicans trying to play nice after leaders in states like Arizona, Texas, New Mexico, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, etc., have offered up punitive policies that can only be deemed racist and anti-Latino.

On to real issues.

Redistricting Today: SD10 and Other Negotiations

Looks like the plaintiffs and the State of Texas have agreed to the SD-10 map, which will stay somewhat favorable for current State Senator Wendy Davis. So, that’s one part of the lawsuit that seems to be done.

Ramsey at the Trib has something, as well as some play-by-play from the rest of the morning. The rest of the maps (Texas House and Congressional) still remain in negotiations. Follow Michael Li’s tweets at Twitter.com/mcpli for the latest.

While some of us have seen some of the bickering and arguing through press releases and even some punches being thrown through Facebook and Twitter, what about the judges? According to Ramsey,

The Texas judges — 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Jerry Smith of Houston, and federal judges Orlando Garcia and Xavier Rodriguez of San Antonio — have to guess what their colleagues in a Washington, D.C.s court might do. The Washington court is deciding whether the maps enacted by the Legislature undermine existing power of minority voters. Without a ruling from that court, the Texas judges have to guess at what might be in a ruling, and to incorporate that with their own judgment about other aspects of the maps. They’re working to put interim maps into place that can be used this year, with the understanding that there will probably be more remapping ahead.

Yeah, pobrecitos.

UPDATE:  Plan on May 29 Primary, Says Judge Smith

Wow! May 29th would basically make Texas Republicans insignificant in the Presidential primary. Or at least, not a catalyst for any given candidate. Still, the negotiations over the Congressional and Texas House maps continue. Keep an eye on the internets and the Tweeters for the latest.

Re-Committing To Voter Registration

There’s no doubt that 2012 is weighing heavily on our minds. With Republican-led voter suppression efforts becoming law around the country, the intent of these efforts is obvious. It’s what we don’t see that we should be worried about, according to my good friend Stan Merriman, who had this op-ed in the Chron.

The Harris County tax assessor-collector has re-created the equivalent of a regressive poll tax by maximizing the time and travel costs of voting. He forces most voters in Harris County to reapply over and over. He then decides whether to allow a citizen to remain on the registration rolls by a secretive purging operation that, even after the lawsuits by the Democratic Party mentioned in the Jan. 30 article, remains largely obscured from public scrutiny. No increase in the voter rolls for this dynamic and growing community is the result.

The Tax Office suspends or cancels voter registrations based on something like a credit check. The office calls it a live check; it sends personal identification information into a so-called “fusion center” and, from there, to where nobody will say. In any case, the unreliable information returned from various sources is used to disqualify or misdirect voters. This is not subject to audit and barely subject to appeal. You the voter just show up at the polls to discover when it is too late to do anything about it that you are not qualified to vote. Just making a simple change of address is difficult and risks cancellation. Voter registration in Harris County is really a lifetime reregistration process costing millions their right to vote and the county millions of dollars.

Many believe new voter identification rules will suppress turnout, but whatever effect they may have is dwarfed by the huge voter suppression caused by our registration process.

There are solutions.

He goes on to give some simple, common sense solutions, so read the rest of the article.

Meanwhile, a voter group has filed a lawsuit against the state of Texas for some of these practices.

The latest lawsuit filed in the Southern District of Texas courts names Texas Secretary of StateHope Andrade and takes aim at the state’s new mandatory training for all volunteer registrars – in which almost anyone who handles a voter’s application as part of a registration drive has to complete training before he or she can be “deputized” to operate in any Texas county. A spokesman for Andrade refused comment.

Population growth in Texas exceeds most other states, while many voter registration rolls throughout the state remain stagnant. As of January, 12.9 million Texans had registered to vote -up just 2 percent from January 2008.

There’s no doubt that this is all part of a pattern to suppress voting opportunities for Texans across the political spectrum. Through some spies, I’m hearing of other things that may be launched soon to cut folks off the rolls. I’m sure we’ll be hearing more about this in the near to not-so-distant future.

More than ever, voter registration will play a major role in the 2012 elections. It’s time to recommit to ensuring Texans remain on the rolls.

It’s time to “true the democracy,” don’t you think?

Stay connected!

Third Centavo: The Texas LULAC Position on The Deal

by Joe Cardenas, III, ED of Texas LULAC

DC NOTE:  After reading much criticism about “the deal,” I sought out Joe to provide a bit more clarification. With so many press releases and comments flying about, I thought it fair to have a clearer view of things from this other side of the debate. If someone on the other side wants to clarify their position, by all means send it in for equal time.

I write this as an attempt to clarify a lot of misinformation that is casting a shadow of doubt on the sincere efforts of Texas LULAC to reach a satisfactory conclusion to redistricting.  Remember that we belong to a coalition of seven organizations called the Texas Latino Redistricting Task Force who organized for the sole purpose of garnering the best possible redistricting plans in the Congress and State House for Latino representation after the Texas Legislature adopted maps that not only failed to give Latinos any additional representation, but that purposely weakened Latino opportunity districts or did away with the viability of Latino preferred candidates.  From the on start, we have been fighting a two-front battle to get what we lost and to increase our representation in the Congress and State House.  That the Texas Attorney General has given its approval of maps that give our community back what it had lost and an increase in representation through Latino opportunity districts is a victory for all Texans!

Our fight in the courts is going well, but the timeframe provided by the court in D.C., makes it likely that Texas will have a split primary that will cost counties throughout the state money that they don’t have and confusion that will keep many from voting; it is estimated that a split primary will cost 15 to 20 million dollars. It is for this reason that the court in San Antonio has urged all parties to negotiate among themselves a plan that is acceptable and in keeping with the voting rights act and the instructions by the Supreme Court; furthermore, and most importantly, Texas LULAC and the Task Force applaud the State’s position that these maps are acceptable for the decade!  Removing redistricting from the state legislative agenda ensures that we can concentrate on the educational issues of the state.

But be warned, there are many detractors who are against Texas LULAC and the Task Force for various reasons stemming from their own lack of foresight.  I have seen the comments and emails from friends in the Democratic party criticize our willingness to support plans that accomplish our goal and provide a springboard to addressing the issue of education for all; I have also witnessed the criticism of Republicans who question whether the Attorney General has the power to agree on a set of plans at this stage of the game.  We have also read various newspaper articles that falsely read that the court has rejected these plans.  Let me be very clear on these naysayers: We are not in the business of protecting the incumbency of any politician whether they are a Democrat or a Republican!  Nor does the argument that some have been left out change our position, for in the end, the only group who matters is the Latino community of Texas.  We do what we do because the Latino community of Texas as a whole will benefit regardless of what some might say.  Texas LULAC will not play politics with the education of our children!

We have an opportunity to support plans that will ensure our community additional representation while removing redistricting from the legislative agenda, all in the spirit of compromise!

Brothers and Sisters, by all accounts, this is a victory, a hard fought victory!  Texas LULAC was the only organization to be present at every state redistricting hearing; it was Texas LULAC that was consistently present in Austin at the hearings; it was Texas LULAC that helped create a Task Force to represent the Latino community.  And, it was Texas LULAC who elected to have MALDEF as its legal representation in order to ensure that the best possible case could be made on behalf of the Latino community of Texas.  We have forced the state to reconsider its stance, and we are on the verge of a victorious compromise that will politically change the way politics are done in Texas.  From this point on the Latino community of Texas is not beholden to any one political party or politician!  We as a community have achieved a level of political maturity that will translate into political power from now on.  You must be willing to stand firm on this compromise that many do not want, but for which so much is at stake.

As a teacher of Government, I often cringe at the politics of D.C. and the inability of our politicians to make decisions for the people rather than for their own self-interests.  Today, we in Texas LULAC find ourselves in a similar situation: do we do what is in the best interest of the people of Texas, or do we bend to the interests of the politicians and their friends? Somewhere along the way, politicians forgot that our nation was forged in the art of compromise for the common good. While we do not agree with all aspects of the proposed plans, they do accomplish our goals, so that we can concentrate on the educational issues of fair-funding, high-stakes testing, and the state’s structural deficit.  We have been given the opportunity to move beyond the issue of redistricting in a satisfactory manner.  Now is the time to do so by again taking the lead in spite of what criticism may come.  In the end, time will prove that our choice was the right choice; and History will remember that it was Texas LULAC that led the way!