Rick Perry’s THECB Takes Steps to Become La Migra

At least that’s what it seems like.

Teddy Wilson at the American Independent reports that the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board is about to give colleges and universities added tasks regarding the Texas DREAM Act. I’ll call them “migra” tasks.

Currently, the Texas DREAM Act calls for a student to sign an affidavit committing to seeking a positive change to their immigration status. The policy change calls for higher education institutions to now manage the affidavits, as well as “remind” students of their obligations to fix their status.

According to the new policy, which has been placed on the consent agenda for the meeting, institutions will be required to “retain the signed affidavits permanently, and to instruct students when they are admitted, annually while they are enrolled, and upon graduation of their obligation to apply for permanent resident status.” The new rules also call for the institutions to “refer students to the proper federal agency” for instructions on how to apply for legalized status.

So, why the change? Well, they blame Mitt and Newt and the rest of the Republicans who have used Latinos and immigrants as their favorite political piñata.

“During the presidential election, when the dialog became so white hot, our board decided that there could be changes to the way the law is implemented,” said Chavez.

So, bigoted remarks by candidates are cause for policy changes, now? And wasteful policy changes, at that, according to a student Wilson quotes in the article.

“Higher education institutions are not knowledgeable in immigration law and would not know how to approach a federal agency about a student’s situation without putting in peril their privacy. For institutions of higher education to handle this without prior training is in fact, an unfunded mandate.”

We’ll be keeping an eye on this. Great article by Teddy Wilson!

FL GOP Debate Clears Up DREAM Views

I think it’s pretty clear:  Both Newt and Mitt do not support the DREAM Act. Well, it’s OK to have DREAMs of citizenship if you want to be a soldier, but even Newt made it clear that going to college should not earn you any rights.

And it looks like Mitt Romney’s immigration plan is pretty simple:  Self-deport, just like his family did–from the US and from Mexico.

On language:  They all reserve the right to campaign in Spanish, but don’t you dare try to conduct gum’mint business in your language. According to Mitt, bilingual education has caused “American” kids to learn less English (if I caught his drift).

So, as the Somos Self-Deporters group tries to spin Romney’s supposed flip-flop, I hope they develop a similar policy pronouncement as Mewt (I can’t tell them apart anymore) so we can tell which Latinos are actually for CIR and DREAM.

Immigration No Longer a Top Issue?

The latest poll from the Pew folks is telling us that fewer Americans see (illegal) immigration as a top issue, Dunham at the Chron reports. Given some of the Republican presidential primary debates, one would think it’s their only issue. Americans, though, seem to be thinking differently.

Thirty-nine percent of Americans call illegal immigration an important issue, down from 55 percent in 2007.

That’s a bigger drop than crime (14 percentage points), the environment and global warming (both 13 point declines).

On the flip side, the economy has rocketed up 18 percentage points in importance since the beginning of the Great Recession. The budget deficit (plus 16 percentage points).

Terrorism has slipped from the top spot on the priority list five years ago to third now, behind the economy and jobs.

Overall, illegal immigration ties for 17th on a list of top priorities, tied with strengthening the U.S. military. The only issues less important to voters are global trade, transportation, cutting military spending, campaign finance and global warming.

Well, this doesn’t mean Republicans will stop using Latinos and immigrants as their political piñata. Whether there are threats of a DREAM Act veto (Romney) or the creation of an all-new Bracero (labor exploitation) program (Gingrich), it is all about making the base and the big corporate check-writers happy. Either of these short-sighted ideas can make Latinos the political cucuy of 2012.

What it does provide us is a window at how voters are feeling nowadays, and if the economy and jobs are the issue, then it will be a battle of ideas. I like our chances in this type of battle, as long as we can clearly outline our ideas and defend them.

And I hope someone reminds some of our blue-dogs that immigration is not a top issue, too.

TDPs Promesa Project Enters Phase Two

The Texas Democratic Party is set to begin the next phase of the Promesa Project, a program designed to engage young Latinos with the purpose of recruiting them to become Democratic messengers.

In this second phase of Promesa, Texas Democrats will launch a Fellowship Program and place fellows in at least eleven campuses across Texas, including: UTEP, UT-Pan Am, UTSA, UT, U of H, A&M-International, UT-Brownsville, UT-Arlington, UNT-Dallas, UH-Downtown, and A&M CC.

“These universities were selected because they have a large Latino enrollment and is perfectly located to provide the opportunity to affect several local competitive races,” said TDP Deputy Executive Director Anthony Gutierrez.

The Promesa Fellowship program will include a training program conducted by experienced campaign professionals. Fellows will then work to register voters, recruit Latinos to the campaign, organize campus events, get out the vote and much more. All the work done by Fellows will be geared towards turning out young Latinos in the Democratic Primary who would likely not participate otherwise.

“Several races across Texas are decided by a small number of votes every cycle,” said State Representative Rafael Anchia (D-Dallas). “We believe this project has the potential to have far-reaching electoral ramifications, including potentially at the statewide level.”

It is great to see this coming about. Let’s hope that this smacks to hell the notion by a republatino group that they are going to tell Latinos to vote for Newt in open primary states because he’s the “Latino-friendly” candidate. Democrats are going the extra mile with a diverse ballot that includes Latin@s who are actually Latino-friendly, unlike the republinuts’ Rubio and Ted Cruz, among others. Why the republatinos would want to support Newt of the Ghetto  is beyond me.

Anyway, Promesa is one of those projects that is giving me some hope regarding the young Latin@ vote in 2012.

Oh just one thing:  Maybe include Texas State University, too.

Thoughts on Viernes…01202012

Texas Media Still Has a Crush on Perry

These kind of articles as “top stories” make me sick. Attempting to give relevance to Rick Perry as he destroys this state just to keep a media job does little justice to the political process. Why not have a continued conversation about how Republicans are intent on destroying this state? Instead, a single-digit presidential candidate is given credence just because he’s from Texas? Embarrassing.

Primaries Will Be Held in December

Well, maybe not, but Republicans are intent on destroying democracy. Not only are they trying to destroy voting rights, they’re trying to destroy voting. There’s different spins to the whole “Supremes reject the maps” story. TDPs is probably the most coherent one.

“The Supreme Court did not strike down the interim maps. The issues they had pertained to the process by which the court arrived at new maps, not necessarily the maps themselves.

While it is not clear what the final districts will look like at this point, what is clear is that the state’s original maps have been found to be discriminatory in some way by every court which has examined them.

The state’s maps completely ignored the demographic realities of Texas. The Supreme Court did not approve the state’s maps and we don’t expect they ever will.”

Republicans Intent on Destroying Latino Voting

That’s right. Emails by Republican legislators found they were indeed attempting to dilute Latino voting strength.

No shame!

I’d wish you all a good weekend, but it’s time to turn these fun weekends into working weekends if we really expect to win in 2012. And you better think outside the box if you really want to win.

DC Reacts to Perry Quitting

Perry’s out?

Was he ever in?

Obviously, I’m no fan of Rick Perry and his policies. He’s still bad for Texas and will return to continue his attempts at destroying Texas. It seems to me the only reason Rick Perry was still in the news–even after his poll numbers tanked and stayed tanked–was because of the Texas media’s weird crush on him. Otherwise, his campaign would have looked smaller than the fly-speck Paint Creek is on the Texas map.

To borrow a line from the guv, “Adios…”

Gingrich’s Republatinos

The big news (apparently) yesterday was that a republatino group came out in support of Gingrich.

And right before a big primary in South Yahoo-lina. Nice strategy.

The reason?

“We believe Speaker Gingrich is the most Hispanic-friendly candidate in the race,” Steve Rodriguez, a spokesman for the group, told CNN in a phone interview from Colorado.

Does this sound Hispanic friendly?

“We should replace bilingual education with immersion in English so people learn the common language of the country and they learn the language of prosperity, not the language of living in a ghetto,” Gingrich said to cheers from the crowd of more than 100.

And these stances aren’t all that Hispanic-friendly, either.

But immigration and being the target of a GOP culture war aren’t the only issues of interest to Latinos. Just like the rest of America, we are interested in jobs and the economy. Latinos want to save Social Security, not privatize it. Latinos support universal health care, not the same old way of doing things. Here are a few of Newt’s stances on these issues.

Que feo, ¿verdad?

Bottom line:  There is no Republican candidate in the mix that is “Hispanic-friendly.”

The Good and Bad

SOPAPILLAS…GOOD

SOPA/PIPA…BAD!

Yes to Sopa…

…de Arroz, that is.

NO! to the other SOPA

Good Jobs Great Houston, HOPE Make Some Good Suggestions

HOPE, the city of Houston’s employee union, has been at the forefront  when it comes to the City’s budget battles. Beyond any city committee’s politically expedient budget proposals, HOPE makes suggestions that would actually strengthen the city’s position, rather than just punt the ball to the next budget cycle.

So, it was not a surprise to see Good Jobs Great Houston and HOPE make a strong statement after a city committee made their budget proposals. Here is the organized group’s list:

Good Jobs Great Houston, of which the Houston Organization of Public Employees is a member, held a news conference outside Wednesday’s City Council meeting to get their own ideas out. They claim that some of the ideas they had submitted to the Task Force did not make it onto the draft list. Among the union’s ideas distributed Wednesday:

  • Raise the city’s tax rate;
  • Establish a higher property tax bracket on homes with a value exceeding $500,000;
  • Establish a 1 percent income tax on city residents who make more than $30,000 a year;
  • A “blight tax” on foreclosed homes that banks would pay on vacant properties they let deteriorate;
  • End the practice of double dipping — remaining on the city payroll while collecting a pension;
  • Put a cap of $100,000 a year on annual pensions for new hires;
  • Review all outsourced services to see if they can be done more efficiently in house.

There are a lot more, but the Good Job Great Houston and HOPE officials said they want the conversation to include more than what’s already on the Task Force’s 229-item draft list.

The union leaders also pointed out things they don’t like on the draft list: eliminating the property tax homestead exemption for the elderly and providing tax abatements and other incentives to lure biotech companies to Houston. The latter, a Good Jobs Great Houston release states, equates to “tax giveaways for big corporations.”

The responsible thing is to put everything on the table, including our city employees’ ideas.

Heck, I would add a commuter income tax (for those who reside outside of the city limits and use our roads and infrastructure while providing little return to our coffers), too.