As Greg Abbott announces his re-election campaign, Democrats are still left wondering who will carry the Donkey flag in 2018 for governor and the other statewide offices. News came out that a Dallasite has announced a run in the Dem primary to take on Abbott, Jeffery Payne.
What caught my eye:
he also opposes the new state law banning sanctuary cities.
While he supports increasing border security, he says those who are in the U.S. illegally should be placed on a path to citizenship.
He got two out of three there. As I’ve always said, never sound like a Republican and “increasing border security” sounds quite Republican. My question to Payne is, what the hell does “increasing border security” even mean?
In a state race like this one, does it mean he supports the DPS border surge which has been all waste, all fear-mongering, and all border militarization? State police border enforcement is OK, but not SB4-type local police enforcement?
Or is he talking about supporting federal efforts, like Trump’s border wall? Or added militarization on the border, except with the national guard?
Or is he just trying to gain a few conservative votes? Ask the last Dems who ran for governor how that went for them, then seek some clarity.
Now, if he is against the sanctuary cities ban, he’s not a bad guy. but seeking “balance” on an issue in which the Republicans have been completely hateful and divisive isn’t necessarily the correct response.
The better response may be to simply call out the hundreds of millions in waste and fear caused by Abbott and his DPS border surge. The increase in crimes not investigated by DPS. The increase of DPS traffic tickets in the Valley. The lack of crime reporting by immigrants and a Latino community that distrusts the police. The travesty of deaths on the border under a hot Texas sun caused by these militarized efforts. Or, the fact that all of this is a political ploy to keep Texans in fear, blaming others, for the problems caused by the Republicans.
We’ve got a lot of material to work with just on this one issue. “Increasing border security” will never be believable to those who vote based on fear and/or hate.
I recently wrote about recent calls for the move to “centrism” as a means of making some anti-immigrant policies acceptable to Democrats. I hope this isn’t the advice our statewides will pay for in 2018.
As West Wing’s Leo McGarry told Jed Bartlet, “Because I’m tired of it – year after year after year after year, having to choose between the lesser of ‘who cares?'”
I did not mean to imply that your one issue lacked importance.
I know that. You GET it. It’s everyone else that pisses me off. lol
As I stated in this post, this guy is good on SB4, it’s his “increasing border security” comment that bothered me. And I think I asked pertinent questions. Wakely only mentions SB4, but I’d like to hear more on the border surge and its waste, etc.
If I’m going to be “one-issue,” I’m going to demand answers if they’re going to talk that tired line of “border security.”
Let’s have your comments on Tom Wakely soon.