Tag Archives: joe biden

Is Biden In Trouble In South Texas?

Posted on March 8, 2024 | 3 comments

A news report on election night got my attention in which it was pointed out that in some South Texas counties, President Joe Biden was actually getting a challenge from Mando Perez-Serrato, one of his many challengers. Kuff has more on him and on this.

Perez-Serrato is one of the many no-name challengers for Biden. In most other states, most of them have been a blip, with Michigan’s “uncommitted” vote being a helluva lot more newsworthy. But the fact that Joe Biden got around 85% of the vote in Texas, a figure that meant some Democratic counties voted in lower percentages, had people asking what was up in South Texas, specifically.

Suffice it to say, it was Marianne Williamson who finished in 2nd place in Texas, with Perez-Serrato coming in 3rd. Should we be worried about counties in which Williamson did better than Perez-Serrato? Of course not! But here we are talking about South Texas.

So, in some South Texas counties, it was reported that Perez-Serrato was getting higher percentages of the vote, but most of those were small counties with him receiving less than 1,000 votes. In larger counties such as Cameron (1800+), Hidalgo (3000+), Webb (2500+), El Paso (1400+) he was getting the numbers that were being reported as “news.” In reality, he only earned over 27,000 votes statewide, with Dean Phillips just behind, but Williamson earned over 40,000. Obviously, these aren’t worrisome in the grand scheme, but in a very Latino South Texas, it is news because maybe the brown folk aren’t loving Biden these days as much as party faithful want.

Well, there are a few reasons to criticize the administration, among them immigration, whether it is about those seeking asylum coming in large numbers or the fact that there is still a broken immigration system that has gone ignored by Congress that is not able to address the needs of the entire system. South Texas is in the thick of it, especially the larger counties, which usually go Democratic. After some losses and close ones in some of these counties in 2020 for Biden, I’m sure the pundits are ready to pounce portraying this as a problem for Biden. Biden’s bigger problem in Texas is, well, Texas. It’s a non-voting state that could be Democratic with the right energy, but it still leans GOP and there are battleground states that will take up those kind of resources.

There are concerns about the numbers of migrants who are released while they go through the asylum process overburdening local services, which happens when people arrive hungry, tired, sick, etc. Some stay locally initially utilizing services of nonprofit groups until they hitch a ride elsewhere or are bussed/flown by Greg Abbott’s publicity stunt to Democratic cities. There are also concerns about Greg Abbott’s land grabs for military purposes in Maverick County. Whether for military camps, migrant jails, or walls, Abbott has been stealing land. And who’s fighting back on behalf of the people? Inaction from the administration and Congress and politicization by Republicans who feign wanting action has frustrated voters to no end in South Texas.

Add to this Republican lies connecting all migrants to crime and anything else that vilifies the foreign and a humanitarian issue becomes quite political, and solutions are avoided.

Bottom line, people in these counties aren’t happy with the situation because what puts them in the news is politics about immigration, rather than their needs for health care, better education, new infrastructure, and economic development that benefits all and not a few.

Perhaps these Dem Primary votes are a response to Biden. It is no surprise that the name they liked was Perez-Serrato, even if he is unknown and hasn’t promoted his stances. It was a primary election, and believe it or not, the local races were probably more important to them than the presidential in this case. When one feels they aren’t being heard in DC, people find ways to let them know. It’s a South Texas thing dictated by a long history where speaking up against those in power was/is frowned upon.

Should Biden be worried about Latinos? In my opinion, he should always be worried about Latinos in South Texas since there is much work to be done and too many issues that go ignored or deprioritized. Any lack of progress is easily exploited by Republicans (even though they cause it most of the time) as inaction–not that they would ever support any action.

As far as percentages go, a recent UnidosUS poll on Latino feelings toward Biden and issues priorities does give Biden a roadmap. Latino voter approval of Biden is at 47%, while 44% disapprove nationwide. Yet, Latinos still see Democrats as being more effective on the issues they deem priorities. Which means those among the disapproving can return when all issues are taken into consideration in comparison to Trump. While Latinos are more concerned about the cost of living, jobs, and health care, as always has been the case, immigration makes an appearance lower on the list. There is concern about the border, but the solutions they support are not draconian, like what is offered by Trump and the Republicans.

Two-thirds of Latinos support fixing the immigration system, while less than a third (30%) support draconian measures, such as mass deportation or “border security” measures promoted by Trump and Abbott. What those in charge should realize, as is stated in the article, is that while not high on the list, Latinos do look at the immigration issue as a means to gauge the feelings of both parties toward Latinos.

Republicans in Texas are now acting on those feelings by instituting racial profiling laws (SB4) and kangaroo courts to railroad migrants into the criminal system, after years of rhetoric and threats of doing as much. What is the Democratic response? Well, fighting against SB4 and Abbott’s floating balls has been a start. But not forcing the overall systemic issues into the public eye has been noticeable and equally exploited by the GOP. Again, not that they support anything that looks like a solution.

No doubt, Republicans are pushing the envelope with their messaging, as Greg Abbott proved during his challenge of GOP incumbents. And if there is enough of a chasm in the Latino electorate on immigration issues, such as the 30% noted above, much like the GOP used fear of losing oil field jobs in Texas because of Biden’s support of the environment in 2020, well, they will exploit this, too. Republicans don’t need a majority of Latinos to win, they just need enough. Unfortunately, Republican lunacy is helping increase those numbers the more Democrats fail to respond, whether in rhetoric or in policy.

But in South Texas, pocketbook issues and immigration sometimes go hand in hand, especially when towns like Eagle Pass and others border towns don’t have the resources to deal with such instant population growth. Local leaders can only do so much without added resources from the State and Federal governments. Abbott refuses to help, instead building walls, taking over parks, and building National Guard camps. And Biden needs Congressional approval for anything related to the issue.

Perhaps these votes, much like those voting for Williamson in other areas of the state, are just a protest. Or people wanting a choice. Again, it was a low turn-out presidential primary with no outlet for grievances other than the primary. As Kuff mentioned, perhaps reporters showing up to South Texas to ask the public would help find the reasons for not voting Biden. Perhaps a very targeted poll of Texas Latinos. One might find that loyalty is a two-way street. Still, good Democrats always return to the one who wins a Primary when taking all of the issues into consideration.

Biden and Democrats need to do a better job of promoting accomplishments and promoting what they are willing to fight for, rather than simply portraying themselves as “not Trump.” There’s nothing wrong with making comparisons regarding policies, but the case must be made for our side–no matter how obvious. Decades of frustration can wear people down.

Biden’s State of the Union last night was a pivotal start to this campaign and a master class on how Democrats should sell Biden, our issues, and the entire slate. Biden hitting on the pocketbook issues was masterful, leaving the Republican response a mere whining of all of the things they don’t want to do for Americans. The Democratic faithful need to follow Biden’s lead and be a free ad for Biden, rather than for el Cheeto pendejo.

Stop worrying about South Texas. But do sell what Democrats are about and the people will respond in kind.

3 Comments

Posted in 2024, Accion, Cultura, DC Promo, Democratic Stuff, Elections, Environmental, Local Politica, Media, Sensible Immigration Reform

Tagged , , , , ,

Explaining the Stace Slate 2024

Posted on March 4, 2024 | Comments Off on Explaining the Stace Slate 2024

One might see a comment at the top of the Stace Slate and even an asterisk. Some will wonder, why this person and not the other. I’ll stick to some of the more obvious one but here goes:

Joe Biden for President. I really do mean he’s all we got. One can go down the line of administration accomplishments and can be easily impressed. I’m not one of those voters since I see it as doing the job one is elected to do, but I am one that expects work to be done on what actually got voters excited to help him win in 2020. So, his big failure is really big and the cause of all of his problems at the moment.

Immigration reform has been a total failure. Blame republinuts all you want, but we had two years of majority representation and couldn’t even get something as simple as codifying DACA or a DREAM Act. When he had the opportunity to include Dreamers in his recent border negotiations, he ignored them. Instead, he sold out the issue to try to gain genocide and war money that only enriches weapons manufacturers, defense companies, and land grabbers in exchange for policies republinuts love. He did exactly what republinuts wanted: Sell out a big part of his base in a very public manner over one issue that divides the Party and another issue that continually goes ignored. If Obama finally caved to sign DACA, then Biden should have taken care of many of these issues with a signature and an order to Mayorkas, including a complete re-do of border-related law enforcement agencies, since he runs them. GOP lawsuits be damned!

And a CEASEFIRE would be nice, too. VP Harris seems to agree.

Still, he’s all we got. But I do remind Dems that with all the talk of saving democracies, Democratic voters weren’t allowed a debate or viable candidates against President Biden. So, we must save the nation from Trump and his evil supporters again in November. These are tiring legislative battles and Biden didn’t help them with his decisions to ignore and sell out on immigration reform. Yes, he’s all we got and Democrats better be selling the accomplishments a lot more than Trump fear. Trump doesn’t need double the free advertising from Dem activists who repeat everything Trump says, and Dems need to prove themselves worthy of votes, beyond being “not Trump.”

Roland Gutierrez for Senate is the good candidate in the bunch. He has served his district well and continues to fight against right-wing interests who are destroying the state. For all the fancy ads and speeches, Colin Allred is one that doesn’t give me the warm and fuzzies. Allred has fundraising ability, sure, but to what end? Lately, it’s the money that has been selling out entire communities and encouraging more war and bad policies. I prefer the more organic candidate who isn’t hand-picked by the most disconnected (from the people) members of our Party.

I put an asterisk on Lizzie Fletcher because the demographics of this district have changed to highly progressive, but her centrist attitudes have not. As someone who was plucked out of Congressman Al Green’s district and placed in this very diverse CD7, I’m not happy and feel ignored on issues that require a fight, rather than some middle of the road thinking that always gets us nowhere. She has failed to realize that she is no longer in a 52-48 split district, but in a district in which one’s voice can carry in DC on more than one issue.

Her continued defense of the killing of innocent Palestinians is bothersome. The killing of 30,000 Palestinians (including thousands of children) because of 200 hostages and 1100 dead is not a proportional response in any American way of military thinking and goes way beyond a nation simply “defending itself.” If the US doesn’t act like this when at war, why are we paying for others to do it? Supporting this continued attack against a defenseless people is just plain wrong and Fletcher should state as much.

So, Lizzie gets an asterisk and a final decision at the voting machine that forced me to skip the race. I do know Pervez Agwan’s people have knocked on my apartment door twice. He’s putting in the work and his stance on the vast majority of issues makes me feel represented. His legal issues (no matter who brought them up), though, deflated any progress he made in convincing people that the district belongs to the people and not to well-funded PACs. Fletcher has done what is required of the job, but I just feel too strongly about genocidal behavior and land grabs that she continually defends.

Also, has anyone in the local Latinorati that gets invited to all of the fancy events reminded her that there are plenty of Latinas that could have been mentioned in her Women’s History Month post?

Several Democratic judges are being threatened with defeat by unknown challengers. The challengers haven’t provided any reason to get rid of them other than what is said by whiny lawyer polls and an even whinier Chron board. (Reminder: The Chron continually endorses Greg Abbott and the idiots who have run against Judge Lina Hidalgo. They get no respect from this blogger.) In one race that truly interests me, the local fish wrap’s endorsement of Judge Julia Maldonado‘s opponent was a diatribe against the incumbent for hurting the feelings of lawyers, according to a lawyer poll, which serves as an internal beauty pageant most of the time. The other judges on my radar, RK Sandill, Mike Engelhart, Robert Schaffer. Ursula Hall, Cheryl Elliot Thornton, and Kyle Carter have earned another term.

Sean Teare is the choice for District Attorney. If you want to know reasons why the incumbent Ogg is not the choice, there’s a website to explain it for you. Targeting Dems like Judge Lina Hidalgo, while paying republican lawyers to investigate her are among the worst of her activities. Recently, two more dirty cops were released by Ogg into the wild after the severe beating of an innocent man. Ogg released the killer cop who helped her husband choke John Hernandez to death at a Dennys, too, and she is still licensed to be a cop. Ogg’s reasons? Because she didn’t think she could win. Yet, she prosecuted a kid two times before she found a jury to go her way on the third.

Sean Teare supports misdemeanor bail reform, doesn’t take money from bail bond crooks, and truly wants to reform the system to ensure those who need to be in jail stay in jail and those who are being railroaded by a broken system have options. We need a DA who will work hand-in-hand with the other elected leaders to ensure justice is served for all. Enough with Ogg’s vendettas!

Bottom line: Democrats need to vote for those who will not only serve well in office but fight for the entire ballot on through November. Frankly, newby judicial challengers who win a primary have a history of just laying low until they are carried into office by the other candidates and ground activists who work for every vote. Beware!

In other news:

A map of Democratic turnout in Texas (from Michael Li) shows a big section of South Texas participating in the 20+%s thanks to some heated DA, State Rep, and local races. This may bode well for Senate candidate Roland Gutierrez, at least to keep things competitive. Most of the state is in the single digits after early voting. Kudos to South Texas for keeping the state competitive among Dems!

Comments Off on Explaining the Stace Slate 2024

Posted in 2024, Accion, Cultura, Democratic Stuff, Elections, Harris County, Local Politica, Media

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

The Taco Distraction

Posted on July 14, 2022 | 1 comment

When I heard FLOTUS compared brown folks to tacos, I didn’t know how to react. Should I be mad (like so many others who also need to stay focused on actual issues)? Should I be disappointed at the crappy speech writer and staff work? Frankly, I’m pretty sure pissing us off wasn’t FLOTUS’ intent. Chalk it up to another case of white folks thinking they’re doing us a favor, maybe?

Arellano at the LATimes provided us a history of politics and Mexican food. I mean, remember Gerald Ford’s failure at tamales? Then, there’s also Varela at MSNBC who expands on the politics of trying to pat brown folks on the head, while avoiding action on the issues that affect us–by both parties.

Says Arellano:

Presidents Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama held lavish diplomatic banquets featuring Mexican food (the Gipper invited actual Mexican chefs; Barry went with Rick Bayless). Jesse Jackson praised Democratic vice presidential candidate Lloyd Bentsen in 1988 for being able to “go from biscuits to tacos to caviar real fast, knowing that’s just the cultural diversity that makes up America.” Bill Clinton went so often to Tex-Mex classic Mi Tierra Cafe in San Antonio that it features a painting of a jogging Slick Willie wearing a — you guessed it! — Mi Tierra Cafe T-shirt.

Most of us agree that while FLOTUS and Democrats shouldn’t ever, ever try to make a funny based on culture (they haven’t earned their barrio card; even some of the brown ones haven’t), Republicans really don’t have a say in any of this. Trying to play on brown folk’s annoyance while vilifying brown folk in their policies is pretty stupid. “They compared you to tacos, all we want to do is put you in cages! Ha! Ha!”

As Varela states:

As much as they don’t want to admit it, Democrats, particularly the Bidens, have been uncomfortable practitioners in not understanding the complexity of the Latino community. Last year, the first lady mispronounced the iconic “Sí se puede” chant in Spanish, leading to some head shakes. About 10 years ago, then-Vice President Joe Biden, speaking to the National Council of La Raza (the previous name of UnidosUS) made a bizarre analogy between Mitt Romney’s tax returns and Latinos having to show their immigration papers, as if immigration status is what solely defined the community. Partisan supporters applauded his comments back then, but it felt a bit disconnected, just like the time when candidate Hilary Clinton in 2016 was being compared to an abuela. But are Republicans really the right ones to launch their criticism at Biden, and at Democrats more widely, when it comes to serving Latinos?

And this is what I’m talking about. Worthless platitudes and attempts at being funny at high-priced conferences that most brown folk cannot afford to attend is not how one gets our vote. But a gaffe sure as hell gets to the people, huh?

No, it’s about the action, pendejos! It’s about what you do once we get you into office. We have a Democratic President, Senate, and House and we can’t get immigration reform passed; not even something as simple as codifying DACA. The rights of women and voters have been thrown to the curb, and that also affects brown folks. Standing up to price gouging corporations in a substantial way, rather than finger-wagging for the cameras, is the least that would be appreciated at the moment. Fight for us, cabrones!

So, I’m not angry. Annoyed? Sure. But most Democratic faithful annoy me since all they want is my vote and not my criticism or even calls for accountability. So much for the democracy they purport to want to save, right?

What I do find annoying is the speechwriting targeted at brown folks and its continual failure at capturing us. The Biden administration poached so many salaried “movement” professionals (labor, farm worker, immigration reform), one would figure they’d be called up to help with what was probably supposed to be a simple, non-controversial speech.

Anyway, I prefer to be distracted by actual tacos.

1 Comment

Posted in 2022, Accion, Cultura, Democratic Stuff, Elections, Historia, History, Media, Republinuttiness

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Reviewing the DNCC – Day 2

Posted on August 19, 2020 | Comments Off on Reviewing the DNCC – Day 2

Well, Day 2 was a lot more palatable.

It was good seeing Texas folks in some of the coverage, including Congresswoman Veronica Escobar of El Paso and State Rep. Victoria Neave of the Dallas area–both early Biden endorsers.

Although I wish Stacey Abrams had spoken longer, I liked Senator Chuck Schumer’s speech as it highlighted what Joe Biden is offering the people, which I think needs to be pounded into the brain of voters. Bill Clinton delivered some good lines that stabbed at the failure that is Trump. The heartstrings were pulled with Jimmy and Roselynn Carter’s speech, perhaps because of my own family memories of watching the DNCC, or the fact that they are up in years, now.

I was not too thrilled with the “empire” portion of the show. Bringing out military and intelligence folks to buttress the US’s drive for world domination, but in a kinder, gentler way, is not my thing.

Much like Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio Cortez stated in her nominating speech of Bernie Sanders, I, too, was hoping for a different kind of foreign policy in 2020 that only Senator Bernie Sanders offered. Unfortunately, Democrats have this need to prove toughness during convention time, rather than promote peace between nations that should be our allies, if the poor and indigenous were not looked down upon by US interests backed up by the US military. These policies pushed by both parties, which are anti-democratic and labor-exploitive must end, or else, the challenges of violence-based, climate-based and economic-based migration will continue.

Joe Biden will keep the US war machine well-oiled and funded when our priorities should be elsewhere during this pandemic, or else the Lincoln Project wouldn’t be so supportive. And he will likely continue US-Latin America policy that has been detrimental to the poor and indigenous of those nations, while supporting right-wing regimes who allow foreign corporations to exploit their natural resources and workers. I mean, ask anyone which Latin American countries have the most mass graves, missing and dead climate and political activists and it will be nations led by right-wing monsters supported by the US.

Thankfully, Dr. Jill Biden saved the day with her presentation. It’s obvious that she would be a first lady who would be proactive and kind, rather than dead inside. No doubt the story of Joe and Jill Biden offers some humanity, rather than the current “blooper reel.”

I think the favorite part was the roll call of states who announced their delegate totals. My favorites were North Dakota and New Mexico, which featured Natives and Chicanos. Somos Indios, cabrones!

And for those that freaked out over Sanders being nominated, that’s all part of the rules and convention process. Those of us who voted for Sanders gave him enough delegates to qualify for nomination, thus, AOC and the UAW guy were asked to give the nominating speeches. Don’t worry, I blame those at the DNC who fail to explain the process for those watching because they think you’re ordinary voters who won’t bother to watch democracy in action.

By the way, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are the nominees, officially.

Anyway, let’s see what Day 3 offers.

Comments Off on Reviewing the DNCC – Day 2

Posted in 2020, Cultura, DC Promo, Democratic Stuff, Elections, Sensible Immigration Reform

Tagged , ,

Reviewing the DNCC – Day 1

Posted on August 18, 2020 | Comments Off on Reviewing the DNCC – Day 1

I think the only part of the Democratic National Convention (Day 1) in which I got teary-eyed was during the singing of the National Anthem and “America,” because I was hoping beyond hope that these tunes would actually mean something, again, in the future. Otherwise…

This first day seemed to be all about appeasing the middle, the right, and the white. That tried and true strategy that never works. Devoting 5 or so minutes to Republicans for Biden who basically stated that Joe Biden was not the big bad leftist portrayed by Trump didn’t leave me feeling warm and fuzzy. If anything, it makes me think that they’ll be quite comfy with the status quo that still enriched them during Dem administrations. The fact that Dems think that this is a workable strategy to gain white Republican votes still leaves me dumbfounded.

The use of Meg Whitman reminded me of her 2010 run for CA guv when she was considered the “cool republican” who suddenly turned on immigrants to the point where she supported the deportation of her undocumented housekeeper if republinuts gave her the nomination. All I saw was a reminder of bigotry and hypocrisy; but, that’s the kind of thing I look for in these kind of events. Let’s face it, after all of these years of immigrants being used as a political piñata by republicans, the Dems using them for votes leaves me disappointed. But, Dems refuse to learn.

Even more embarrassing was the use of Art Acevedo, the HPD head cop, in a racial justice discussion. He still hasn’t answered for HPDs killing of Nicolas Chavez, he refused to release bodycam footage of the killing, yet, the Democrats seem to think he’s part of the “racial justice” solution. What’s his answer? Crocodile tears and high-fiving protesters before gassing them and wrongly arresting them? I’m not the only one who was perturbed by this. Hell, Julian Castro has been doing some great work regarding police reform; why wasn’t he in this discussion?

Senator Catherine Cortez Masto and Senator Bernie Sanders were exceptional in pointing out the Biden agenda (which is what we all need to hear), especially Bernie. Bernie even did a better job on the issue of immigration and hate in his few minutes of speaking. And I’ll be the first to agree that a guy that looks like Bernie Sanders (old and white) should be stating these positions and not just brown folk. I hope Biden states them so eloquently.

Michelle Obama gave a great speech, as always, but I know I wouldn’t be able to say that being President reveals who you really are knowing my spouse deported 3 million immigrants and warehoused hundreds of thousands more (kids included). Of course, when it comes to remembering the “good ol’ days” of the Obama administration, I’m pretty much dead inside. Still, good speech.

Anyway, we’re all trying our damnest to be good soldiers despite the things that piss us off about those in charge of the Democratic Party. As Bernie reminded us, some of the issues we have fought for are now part of mainstream messaging (if not thinking) in the Party. It’s our job to keep those we elect accountable is what we’re told about democracy. Therefore, expecting better candidates does not end when the ticket is decided, either.

On to Day 2.

 

Comments Off on Reviewing the DNCC – Day 1

Posted in 2020, Cultura, Democratic Stuff, Elections

Tagged , , , ,

Biden States Case For Latino Support

Posted on August 5, 2020 | 1 comment

credit: Alamy

Joe Biden stated his case for the Latino electorate with a lengthy article stating where he stands on issues affecting Latinos.

President Trump’s assault on Latino dignity started on the very first day of his campaign. His assault doesn’t just reveal itself in the betrayal of the Dreamers or in the pardoning of a sheriff who has terrorized the Latino community. It’s in the underfunding of schools, in attacks on labor and the ability of workers to bargain for their worth, and in the neglect of Puerto Ricans after Hurricane Maria. Trump’s strategy is to sow division — to cast out Latinos as being less than fully American.

Generally, he promised the following.

Biden will:

  • Invest in Latinos’ economic mobility.

  • Make far-reaching investments in ending health disparities by race.

  • Expand access to high-quality education and tackle racial inequity in our education system.

  • Combat hate crimes and gun violence.

  • Secure our values as a nation of immigrants.

Specifically, he talked about supporting a Latino museum at the Smithsonian and political appointees to his administration that will look like America. Included is a promise to expand Latino small business opportunities and jobs creation through infrastructure development. Within this, improving the treatment of workers and expanding worker protection is on his to-do list. To support Latino families, he would address lack of access to child care for essential workers and early education. Expanding Latino homeownership is on his list, too.

One important part of his plan is expanding access to health care through a public option for health insurance and ACA subsidies to make Obamacare more affordable. Most importantly, addressing the inequality experienced by the Latino community that block their access to health care. It’s not Medicare-for-all, but given his primary campaign, I didn’t expect it. Given how COVID-19 has exposed the weaknesses in health care and insurance, it should still be discussed.

In the realm of higher education, Biden is committed to increasing college graduation rates, tuition-free higher education including 2-year workforce programs, increased access to student financial aid, student debt forgiveness, investing in Hispanic-Serving Institutions, bringing HSI and HBCUs into high-tech research, among other commitments.

Pointing to Trump’s anti-immigrant nature, Biden promises to send an immigration bill to Congress on Day 1 which will modernize the immigration system and include a roadmap to citizenship for 11 million undocumented residents of the US.

On the detention side, Biden promises to decrease its use, passing on the case management responsibility to nonprofit groups while migrants go through the system. And Biden also promises to stop Trump’s policy of caging children in favor of family reunification. [I hope they aren’t reunified in family-style prisons.] Added on is a decrease in the use of 287(g) agreements to take out local law enforcement from the equation.

Really, folks, check out this article, which includes links to his policy pronouncements on his campaign website. It’s actually better than I expected, though, we will have conversations about his Latin America policy soon enough since it doesn’t seem to be any different than what Republicans offer:  More election meddling and coups in support of right-wing, murderous regimes who care little for the poor and indigenous.

Some of you will see articles about the Orange one making a play for Latinos, too. Basically, he’ll speak to the same self-hating, anti-immigrant, bigoted brown folk (including some of our relatives) who think they’re excluded from Trump’s anti-Latino hate. For some reason, they buy into it. So, Democrats should not waste time with them, instead concentrate on increasing the bottom line with folks who want a reason to vote for Democrats.

Yes, many of us feel like we’re just voting for the next guy we’ll be protesting. For sure, we will be making Biden accountable for these promises during the campaign and once in office. And another thing, Biden cannot be a repeat of the Obama years in which access for Latino activists to the White House was controlled by elitists not involved in progressive causes. Latino activists must be part of the discussion of issues, and not just inclusive of those content with invites to the White House Cinco de Mayo event and other photo ops.

And guess what? There will be Dems (brown ones included) who will be upset for the people demanding what was promised. But tough shit. We are only exercising our right to participate and to petition our government for a redress of grievances. Trump has expanded those grievances and “going back to normal” is not an option. It must be better.

The job for everyone who wants to rid us of the Orange one is to sell what Biden is offering, and NOT what Trump is doing or saying. Dems need to stop being a free ad for the Orange one where all they do is point a finger at how bad Trump is. Biden has stated his case and Dems need to back it up when trying to earn the Latino vote.

 

1 Comment

Posted in Accion, Cultura, Education - K12, Elections, Health Care, Higher Education, Sensible Immigration Reform, U.S. Capitol

Tagged , , , , , ,

Johnny Hernandez Drops Anti-Trump Tune

Posted on July 24, 2020 | 1 comment

The legendary Johnny Hernandez is making his feelings about the current resident of the White House heard in a new protest tune, co-written by Chalo, he just dropped this week.

It’s Time To Unite is an anthem calling on folks to unite to rid us of Trump in November with a Motown funk-heavy beat that offers lots of soul.

In case you’re wondering, YES, Chicanos can perform just about anything and Hernandez’s musical upbringing includes all the standard genres that influenced everything else.

It is refreshing to see a Tejano legend tell it like it is and if you follow him on Facebook, it’s easy to see where Johnny stands. His brother Little Joe has recently endorsed a lot of Democrats, including Joe Biden. The new schoolers in the Tejano industry could learn a few things from these guys and the industry’s history of being a part of the Civil Rights and Farmworker movements.

Here’s the link to the song. Enjoy and have a great weekend.

1 Comment

Posted in 2020, Cultura, DC Promo

Tagged , , , , ,

Joe Biden and Latinos

Posted on May 21, 2020 | 1 comment

credit: Alamy

This last week was not a good one regarding Latino support for Joe Biden–at least in online media. An article in Politico shows various activists calling the Biden campaign out for their lack of outreach, or lack of a game plan to excite the Latino electorate. Even the LA Times had something on Latinos and Biden.

Joe Biden won the primary in spite of, not because of, his efforts to turn out Latinos. Two months later, Hispanic leaders are waiting on his campaign to deliver on its promises to do more.

In interviews, more than 20 Latino political operatives, lawmakers, and activists said they don’t see a game plan from Biden to marshal Hispanic voters effectively in the fall. They said there’s little evidence the campaign is devoting the resources or hiring the staff that task will require — all the more crucial during a pandemic, when reaching and mobilizing Latino voters through in-person canvassing is nearly impossible.

Throughout the Primary season, the Latino political players were backing one of the many in the running. Personally, I began with Julian Castro before jumping back on the Bernie wagon. The players, though, were mostly “anyone but Bernie” even settling on Biden because he wasn’t Bernie.

Anyway, Latino Democratic voters, those with whom the DNC, DCCC, and DSCC are usually out of touch and disconnected, were supporting Bernie in many states. So obvious was this support for Bernie that Biden didn’t even campaign for the Latino vote during the Primary. I mean, if there was a time that Democrats were hoping for low Latino turnout, it seems like it was during this last Primary. It’s not that we Berniestas only like Tio Bernie because he exists, it was that he took the issues that we poll strongest on seriously:  Education, Jobs, Health Care, and immigration and deportation reform. Biden defending the Obama deportation record didn’t help his Primary cause among Latinos who actually pay attention. Of course, he now calls 3,000,000 deportations a “big mistake.” Good move.

Well, we know the result. Joe Biden wins and deals are made to ensure representation of Bernie supporters at the National Convention and on Biden’s campaign. The policy of appeasement was definitely in play so the whole unity thing can be sold to all involved. As an avid voter, I’m fine with those efforts, as long as the rank-and-file stop insulting Bernie supporters over 2016 (still!). But statistics show Latinos are not avid voters and need to be reached out to because they can see right through the bullshit in politics. To the point where half of us stay home during a presidential year.

Of course, a good look at the recently released list of issues advisors to Biden shows most brown people are on the immigration plank, and Alexandria Ocasio Cortez as the only brown face on the climate panel. Otherwise, it’s slim pickings, if any at all, when it comes to Latinos. Even I know at least one brown person capable of being on each issues group, so, why aren’t they on these lists?

Again, Biden has made efforts to appease the Latino electorate regarding immigration and economic issues, but if these articles about engagement and outreach are already coming out, then something needs to change. And perhaps it is.

I will add that this week’s appointment of Julie Chavez Rodriguez, Cesar’s granddaughter, is a nice gesture. But when the campaign states in the next paragraph that their targets include Florida, all I see coming are a repeat of 2016’s bad and ineffective radio ads comparing Trump to a dead Venezuelan President whose domestic policies were closer to what is in the Democratic platform. It’s no different than the red-baiting of Bernie Sanders during the Primary in Florida because he gave an honest summing up of the Cuban Revolution. It might get you a few votes in Florida, but the rest of Latinodom in the US is going to see right through it, thus, making outreach ineffective. In other words, you better do better than Florida if we want to win state houses and local races across the country.

When the Castro Brothers can be counted among those of us who aren’t excited about Joe Biden, well, that says a lot. I expect a lot of Demsplaining and whitesplaining about this, but maybe the Party should be listening. For a change. Even after the popular brown folk in the Party fall in line.

The pandemic obviously has hurt all campaigns. But it seems that even with the profiteering and willful misconduct occurring at the White House and in republican-led state governments, Democrats and Biden aren’t hitting back as hard as they should. Locally-elected Dems are struggling in these situations and we need a national voice to hit back.

I think voters, Latinos especially, would feel the warm and fuzzies a lot more if our champion actually championed. No, we’re not expecting him to run unmasked into a rally of thousands to cheerlead in the midst (or mist) of a COVID19 cloud. But talk to us. And tell the world what Biden wants to do that is different than what the current orange trainwreck offers America. Simply pointing out what Trump is doing wrong or badly will just be a repeat of 2016–a free ad for Trump. Voters need to hear solutions to the problems Trump has caused. Voters need hope. I know I do!

The results of this pandemic are telling us that Latinos are taking a huge hit–healthwise (COVID19-wise) and economically. Latinos have lost more jobs and the number of uninsured continues to rise in the Latino community (20%). And these numbers don’t even consider the undocumented community, which has its own challenges (made worse by Trump). It’s hard to get someone excited about voting when someone you know or to whom you are related is affected in one way or another by the pandemic and the options are Trump or Not Trump. Again, I’m not talking about voters like me, but the other half who get disinterested really fast.

For some of us, getting rid of Trump may be enough, but a lot more effort is needed to ensure this happens in a big way and that means talking solutions. I’m pretty sure Latinos want to support the Biden way of getting things done. And I guess we just want to hear more about what he wants to get done. Or, Biden could name a Latina, like Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham as the VP nominee and he’d be golden.

Naming Amy Klobuchar, though, would be quite underwhelming.

1 Comment

Posted in 2020, Cultura, Elections

Tagged , , , , ,